How to use in-sentence of “rounding”:
– One reason for rounding up at 0.5 is that only one digit need be examined.
– If you try this on your calculator, sometimes it may make a rounding error at the end.
– There are many ways of rounding a number “y” to an integer “q”.
– On the other hand, rounding can introduce some “round-off error” as a result.
– When rounding to a predetermined number of significant digits, the increment “m” depends on the magnitude of the number to be rounded.
– In some contexts, all the rounding methods above may be unsatisfactory.
– On the other hand, truncation is still the default rounding method used by many languages, especially for the division of two integer values.

Example sentences of “rounding”:
– All figures are percentages; due to rounding they may not add up to exactly 100.
– This type of rounding occurs implicitly with numbers computed with floating-point values with limited precision, but it may be used more generally to round any real values with any positive number of significant digits and any strictly positive real base.
– Due to the precision used in the automatic calculation of the currently projected population, a rounding error occurs in the output and this needs to be compensated for periodically in order to reduce this error, or else the error will compound over time.
– Other kinds of rounding had to be programmed explicitly; for example, rounding a positive number to the nearest integer could be implemented by adding 0.5 and truncating.
– For instance rounding 9.46 to one decimal gives 9.5, and then 10 when rounding to integer using rounding half to even, but would give 9 when rounded to integer directly.
– In practice, when rounding large sets of sampled data, because it will still preserve the hyperbolic convergence towards zero of the overall mean roundoff error bias and of its standard deviation.
– In the case of full reproducibility, such as when rounding a number to a representable floating point number, the word “precision” has a meaning not related to reproducibility.
– Rounding a number twice in succession to different precisions, with the latter precision being coarser, is not guaranteed to give the same result as rounding once to the final precision except in the case of directed rounding.
- All figures are percentages; due to rounding they may not add up to exactly 100.
- This type of rounding occurs implicitly with numbers computed with floating-point values with limited precision, but it may be used more generally to round any real values with any positive number of significant digits and any strictly positive real base.
– The results above had a small error, but this was due to the rounding of numbers.
– This type of rounding, which is also named rounding to a logarithmic scale, is a variant of Rounding to a specified increment but with an increment that is modified depending on the scale and magnitude of the result.
– Calculated by dividing population and rounding to nearest whole number.
– However, rounding is set to more decimals, and the compounnd has atoms with “less precision”, the resulting number will be inaccurate.
– For example, rounding by 1 gives 1 decimal digit, rounding by0 gives integers, or rounding by-2 gives the amount in hundreds.
– The most common type of rounding is to round to an integer; or, more generally, to an integer multiple of some increment—such as rounding to whole tenths of seconds, hundredths of a dollar, to whole multiples of 1/2 or 1/8 inch, to whole dozens or thousands, etc..
