How to use in-sentence of “bureaucrat”:
+ From a technical point of view, it is better to say that bureaucrat‘s cannot delete/protect/block, and they only can promote other users to sysop or bureaucrat level, and can rename user accounts, and grant falgs to bot accounts.
+ Otherwise, I would be glad to be granted the bureaucrat flag, as I am an excellent bureaucrat on Simple English Wikiquote.
+ As a result, I am making the decision to remove sysop rights in addition to bureaucrat rights.
+ In terms of what I would do and prior experience, I’m a bureaucrat at a number of other wikis so have experience of the technical aspects.
+ Friendly disclaimer: this message wasn’t written by a bot, a bureaucrat or a person who doesn’t care about your project.
+ Bureaucrats can give administrator or bureaucrat rights to other users, following a successful request on, which means to hide their contributions from the new changes and put them in the bot group.
+ The bureaucrat then goes to university to work on his Master’s Degree in Computer Science for an hour.
+ With us now being about half way through 2009, i’ve also had a look back at the predictions that I made in our, the flood flag has been enabled, and GBots 3 and 4 have both been brought online – albeit with some problems, and not as was originally intended! There have also been no less than 16 Sysop promotions – of which one was mine and one was a re-promotion, 3 Bureaucrat promotions, and 2 CheckUser promotions.
Example sentences of “bureaucrat”:
+ Please voice your opinion; If there is consensus, a bureaucrat can re-instate him on the 16th of this month.
+ I would like to present to the community for the bureaucrat flag.
+ I also think a bureaucrat should go ahead and close his RfA immediately.
+ Please voice your opinion; If there is consensus, a bureaucrat can re-instate him on the 16th of this month.
+ I would like to present to the community for the bureaucrat flag.
+ I also think a bureaucrat should go ahead and close his RfA immediately.
+ I also believe that he will be able to use the bureaucrat tools to be able to better help out our community by being a bureaucrat in a time zone that isn’t currently covered by any other bureaucrat.
+ I would like to nominate myself for a CheckUser, I’m also a sysop and a bureaucrat here but I think that I could help more with CU flag.
+ Co-nomination from : I’d like to co-nominate The Rambling Man for the Bureaucrat Flag per pretty much all the reasons that Razorflame has made.
+ I propose every administrator is made a bureaucrat retrospectively and in future.
+ An administrator or bureaucrat should lose their flag when they are badly harming the project.
+ I’m an admin on Uncyclopedia, the UnMeta project, and two wikia, and I’m a bureaucrat on the last three.
+ Could we get an admin or a bureaucrat to maybe close the discussion now either way as I think it has run its course.
+ The bureaucrat wakes up between 8 and 9, local time.
More in-sentence examples of “bureaucrat”:
+ Since it’s policy, then after one year, they should be removed by a bureaucrat without the need for a discussion.
+ Also a steward may need to remove the bureaucrat and administrator rights from a bureaucrat in an emergency.
+ Since it would be easy to get bureaucrat status, it should also be easy to revoke this status on candidates that go inactive.
+ If people think I should ask for Bureaucrat back I’m happy to do so but am working under the assumption that the need for an extra, relatively inactive one, is less.
+ We are limiting ourselves way too much – I suppose if a bureaucrat even makes a formatting fix on an RFA, that makes them involved too now? It really is getting to silly levels – we need to trust our bureaucrats more.
+ If a candidate is successful, an administrator or bureaucrat should add them to MediaWiki:Gadget-HighlightAdmins.js.
+ I feel this RFB falls within the descretion of a bureaucrat as taking all the preceeding into account it is very close to call.
+ However, as Archer said, it is usual for a user to become a bureaucrat “after” becoming a sysop, so they will be sysop+bureaucrat, and the former means they can delete/protect/block.
+ The main thing a bureaucrat can do, which ‘sysop’ cannot, is promote users to be sysops.
+ For advice on what to do if such behavior is observed, please contact a bureaucrat or administrator.
+ OK guys, I’m now “resigning” from my bureaucrat duties.
+ Other active administrators have also been asked to candidate themselves for bureaucrat position.
+ He already has some experience being a bureaucrat because he is a bureaucrat over on the Simple English Wikiquote.
+ I feel that he would make an excellent bureaucrat and would be a great addition to the wiki team.
+ Or we can let this discussion continue and let a bureaucrat decide if consensus has been reached.
+ Chung Doo-un was a South Korean bureaucrat and politician.
+ At some point, some admin or bureaucrat will have to “close” this poll and announce a decision.
+ Following up on the last post, I would therefore, if the community decides to demote Blockinblox from bureaucrat to nominate Creol to succeed him.
+ While there is some disagreement as to whether or not both flags should be removed, the administrator bit is just as much a position of community trust as bureaucrat is; there is a fairly strong consensus among editors that the community’s trust in this editor has been broken.
+ Even though he does have some amount of activity, the last time that he did any bureaucrat work was back in November of last year.
+ Sometimes a bureaucrat may need to take the administrator right away from an administrator in an emergency.
+ This page was used by users to ask a bureaucrat to change their username for them until 15th September 2014, when bureaucrats lost their rights to rename users locally.
+ As I might be the closing bureaucrat for this, I will not vote, I do however invite all of you who made up their minds to express their opinion.
+ If the consensus is that we did, then I will assure you that I will resign and no longer place the position of Simple English Bureaucrat in such jeopardy ever again.
+ I, would like to present to the community for the bureaucrat flag.
+ It may well be that a bureaucrat has a certain opinion about a candidate, but as he sees what certain people wrote, he closes completely differently to his opinion.
+ Since it's policy, then after one year, they should be removed by a bureaucrat without the need for a discussion.
+ Also a steward may need to remove the bureaucrat and administrator rights from a bureaucrat in an emergency.
+ At that time we had fewer users, and it was frequent that the bureaucrat who closed, also voted in the RfA.
+ When a bureaucrat and checkuser left at the beginning of this year, this brought weeks of re-electing new checkusers; with the drama that followed.
+ However, I am willing to act as a bureaucrat for a few months or so, as we’re gonna need someone and the choices are rather limited, and I have the time to perform promotions and other technical tasks.
+ The result is successful, which means Kennedy’s sysop and bureaucrat flags are revoked.
+ Once all the requirements are met, a local bureaucrat will issue the flag.
+ I hope you can life with my decission, if not, any bureaucrat is free to remove the flag.
+ If both of the selected candidates get enough votes, we will of course both make them crats; Becoming a bureaucrat is about trust, mostly.
+ Blockinblox, even though he has done a great job of being a bureaucrat in the past, has not been very active recently.
+ He is also a very active administrator and bureaucrat over on Meta, and I fully trust him to be able to handle the privacy policy related to these tools with honor and respect to that policy.
+ FInally, after a day’s work, the Bureaucrat will edit Simple, perhaps while reading until 11:30 PM orr 1: AM.
+ RfOS and RfCUs should be left to stewards to make the ultimate decision and then closed by a bureaucrat here.
+ It also wouldn’t hurt to have a bureaucrat in the Americas who would close RfXs when Eptalon, TRM or Vector are asleep or when Chenzw is at school.
+ This user is one of the only users on this site that I fully trust and trust enough to give the bureaucrat tools to.
+ Since the bureaucrat user group is not particularly controversial or dangerous, especially now we have the two-crat rule, we need to even out the percentages here.
+ I discovered two sysops, SimonMayer an inactive bureaucrat who made his last edit 1 1/2 years ago on December ’05 and Brion VIBBER, a developer in meta and also has been absent for more than 1 1/2 years; his last edit was on October ’05.
+ I cannot even E-mail a bureaucrat because my “Special:Emailuser” function is blocked, and the 68.224.239.145/Anonymous account is not registered.
+ The current version makes no mention of any acceptable range for bureaucrat discretion nor the possibility for the challenging of closures.
+ Recently, the election of Bureaucrat criteria was changed so that candidates who get the support of two current crats are automatically promoted.
+ A bureaucrat closes an RFA based on what the community wants – a bureaucrat is part of the community too.
+ Supports or opposes that deal merely with how popular or unpopular a candidate is without dealing with the persons abilities to perform the role of an admin or bureaucrat would be less helpful.
+ You may enter either or both of: the administrator or bureaucrat changing the right, or the user whose rights were changed.
+ Could a bureaucrat close the above RfA and find the consensus of it? It was supposed to be closed several hours ago, but I guess no bureaucrats were around then.
+ Would any bureaucrat who isn’t too busy be so kind as to desysop me per this? : It’s always been my firm opinion that an administrator ought to be active, and I don’t think I can be so anymore.