<\/p>\n
+ Otherwise, I would be glad to be granted the bureaucrat<\/strong><\/strong> flag, as I am an excellent bureaucrat<\/strong><\/strong> on Simple English Wikiquote.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + As a result, I am making the decision to remove sysop rights in addition to bureaucrat<\/strong> rights.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + In terms of what I would do and prior experience, I’m a bureaucrat<\/strong> at a number of other wikis so have experience of the technical aspects.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Friendly disclaimer: this message wasn’t written by a bot, a bureaucrat<\/strong> or a person who doesn’t care about your project.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Bureaucrat<\/strong>s can give administrator or bureaucrat<\/strong> rights to other users, following a successful request on, which means to hide their contributions from the new changes and put them in the bot group.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + The bureaucrat<\/strong> then goes to university to work on his Master’s Degree in Computer Science for an hour.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + With us now being about half way through 2009, i’ve also had a look back at the predictions that I made in our, the flood flag has been enabled, and GBots 3 and 4 have both been brought online – albeit with some problems, and not as was originally intended! There have also been no less than 16 Sysop promotions – of which one was mine and one was a re-promotion, 3 Bureaucrat<\/strong> promotions, and 2 CheckUser promotions.\n<\/p>\n + Please voice your opinion; If there is consensus, a bureaucrat<\/strong> can re-instate him on the 16th of this month.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + I would like to present to the community for the bureaucrat<\/strong> flag.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + I also think a bureaucrat<\/strong> should go ahead and close his RfA immediately.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + I also believe that he will be able to use the bureaucrat<\/strong><\/strong><\/strong> tools to be able to better help out our community by being a bureaucrat<\/strong><\/strong><\/strong> in a time zone that isn’t currently covered by any other bureaucrat<\/strong><\/strong><\/strong>.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + I would like to nominate myself for a CheckUser, I’m also a sysop and a bureaucrat<\/strong> here but I think that I could help more with CU flag.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Co-nomination from : I’d like to co-nominate The Rambling Man for the Bureaucrat<\/strong> Flag per pretty much all the reasons that Razorflame has made.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + I propose every administrator is made a bureaucrat<\/strong> retrospectively and in future.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + An administrator or bureaucrat<\/strong> should lose their flag when they are badly harming the project.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + I’m an admin on Uncyclopedia, the UnMeta project, and two wikia, and I’m a bureaucrat<\/strong> on the last three.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Could we get an admin or a bureaucrat<\/strong> to maybe close the discussion now either way as I think it has run its course.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + The bureaucrat<\/strong> wakes up between 8 and 9, local time.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Since it’s policy, then after one year, they should be removed by a bureaucrat<\/strong> without the need for a discussion.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Also a steward may need to remove the bureaucrat<\/strong><\/strong> and administrator rights from a bureaucrat<\/strong><\/strong> in an emergency.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Since it would be easy to get bureaucrat<\/strong> status, it should also be easy to revoke this status on candidates that go inactive.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + If people think I should ask for Bureaucrat<\/strong> back I’m happy to do so but am working under the assumption that the need for an extra, relatively inactive one, is less.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + We are limiting ourselves way too much – I suppose if a bureaucrat<\/strong><\/strong> even makes a formatting fix on an RFA, that makes them involved too now? It really is getting to silly levels – we need to trust our bureaucrat<\/strong><\/strong>s more.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + If a candidate is successful, an administrator or bureaucrat<\/strong> should add them to MediaWiki:Gadget-HighlightAdmins.js.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + I feel this RFB falls within the descretion of a bureaucrat<\/strong> as taking all the preceeding into account it is very close to call.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + However, as Archer said, it is usual for a user to become a bureaucrat<\/strong><\/strong> “after” becoming a sysop, so they will be sysop+bureaucrat<\/strong><\/strong>, and the former means they can delete\/protect\/block.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + The main thing a bureaucrat<\/strong> can do, which ‘sysop’ cannot, is promote users to be sysops.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + For advice on what to do if such behavior is observed, please contact a bureaucrat<\/strong> or administrator.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + OK guys, I’m now “resigning” from my bureaucrat<\/strong> duties.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Other active administrators have also been asked to candidate themselves for bureaucrat<\/strong> position.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + He already has some experience being a bureaucrat<\/strong><\/strong> because he is a bureaucrat<\/strong><\/strong> over on the Simple English Wikiquote.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + I feel that he would make an excellent bureaucrat<\/strong> and would be a great addition to the wiki team.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Or we can let this discussion continue and let a bureaucrat<\/strong> decide if consensus has been reached.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Chung Doo-un was a South Korean bureaucrat<\/strong> and politician.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + At some point, some admin or bureaucrat<\/strong> will have to “close” this poll and announce a decision.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Following up on the last post, I would therefore, if the community decides to demote Blockinblox from bureaucrat<\/strong> to nominate Creol to succeed him.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + While there is some disagreement as to whether or not both flags should be removed, the administrator bit is just as much a position of community trust as bureaucrat<\/strong> is; there is a fairly strong consensus among editors that the community’s trust in this editor has been broken.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Even though he does have some amount of activity, the last time that he did any bureaucrat<\/strong> work was back in November of last year.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Sometimes a bureaucrat<\/strong> may need to take the administrator right away from an administrator in an emergency.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + This page was used by users to ask a bureaucrat<\/strong><\/strong> to change their username for them until 15th September 2014, when bureaucrat<\/strong><\/strong>s lost their rights to rename users locally.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + As I might be the closing bureaucrat<\/strong> for this, I will not vote, I do however invite all of you who made up their minds to express their opinion.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + If the consensus is that we did, then I will assure you that I will resign and no longer place the position of Simple English Bureaucrat<\/strong> in such jeopardy ever again.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + I, would like to present to the community for the bureaucrat<\/strong> flag.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + It may well be that a bureaucrat<\/strong> has a certain opinion about a candidate, but as he sees what certain people wrote, he closes completely differently to his opinion.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + At that time we had fewer users, and it was frequent that the bureaucrat<\/strong> who closed, also voted in the RfA.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + When a bureaucrat<\/strong> and checkuser left at the beginning of this year, this brought weeks of re-electing new checkusers; with the drama that followed.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + However, I am willing to act as a bureaucrat<\/strong> for a few months or so, as we’re gonna need someone and the choices are rather limited, and I have the time to perform promotions and other technical tasks.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + The result is successful, which means Kennedy’s sysop and bureaucrat<\/strong> flags are revoked.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Once all the requirements are met, a local bureaucrat<\/strong> will issue the flag.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + I hope you can life with my decission, if not, any bureaucrat<\/strong> is free to remove the flag.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + If both of the selected candidates get enough votes, we will of course both make them crats; Becoming a bureaucrat<\/strong> is about trust, mostly.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Blockinblox, even though he has done a great job of being a bureaucrat<\/strong> in the past, has not been very active recently.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + He is also a very active administrator and bureaucrat<\/strong> over on Meta, and I fully trust him to be able to handle the privacy policy related to these tools with honor and respect to that policy.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + FInally, after a day’s work, the Bureaucrat<\/strong> will edit Simple, perhaps while reading until 11:30 PM orr 1: AM.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + RfOS and RfCUs should be left to stewards to make the ultimate decision and then closed by a bureaucrat<\/strong> here.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + It also wouldn’t hurt to have a bureaucrat<\/strong> in the Americas who would close RfXs when Eptalon, TRM or Vector are asleep or when Chenzw is at school.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + This user is one of the only users on this site that I fully trust and trust enough to give the bureaucrat<\/strong> tools to.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Since the bureaucrat<\/strong> user group is not particularly controversial or dangerous, especially now we have the two-crat rule, we need to even out the percentages here.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + I discovered two sysops, SimonMayer an inactive bureaucrat<\/strong> who made his last edit 1 1\/2 years ago on December ’05 and Brion VIBBER, a developer in meta and also has been absent for more than 1 1\/2 years; his last edit was on October ’05.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + I cannot even E-mail a bureaucrat<\/strong> because my “Special:Emailuser” function is blocked, and the 68.224.239.145\/Anonymous account is not registered.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + The current version makes no mention of any acceptable range for bureaucrat<\/strong> discretion nor the possibility for the challenging of closures.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Recently, the election of Bureaucrat<\/strong> criteria was changed so that candidates who get the support of two current crats are automatically promoted.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n![\"bureaucrat](\"https:\/\/englishteststore.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/bureaucrat-use-in-sentences.jpg\" "\\"bureaucrat")
Example sentences of “bureaucrat”:<\/h2>\n
+ Please voice your opinion; If there is consensus, a bureaucrat<\/strong> can re-instate him on the 16th of this month.\r\n
+ I would like to present to the community for the bureaucrat<\/strong> flag.\r\n
+ I also think a bureaucrat<\/strong> should go ahead and close his RfA immediately.\r\n
<\/pre>\nMore in-sentence examples of “bureaucrat”:<\/h2>\n
+ Since it's policy, then after one year, they should be removed by a bureaucrat<\/strong> without the need for a discussion.\r\n
+ Also a steward may need to remove the bureaucrat<\/strong><\/strong> and administrator rights from a bureaucrat<\/strong><\/strong> in an emergency.\r\n
<\/pre>\n