<\/p>\n
– Note: If too many disruptive<\/strong> changes are made using this IP address, making changes without an account may be disabled.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – These accounts have been following the same pattern of disruptive<\/strong> behavior and creating bad pages.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – After almost 300 edits in the last three days, I didn’t feel the need to become myself admin neither about blocking disruptive<\/strong> contributors nor about blanking entries.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – It is widely agreed upon that he has been disruptive<\/strong> and\/or pushing POV on Simple Talk, user talk pages, RfAs, etc, but look at templates such as Template:WWEPPV.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – But at the same time, if user page activity becomes disruptive<\/strong> to the community or gets in the way of the task of building an encyclopedia, it must be changed.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Note that all 3 IPs that have edited the page are blocked on enwiki as part of a school block, with one being previously blocked for disruptive<\/strong> editing.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Since this issue is a sensitive political issue and involves issues regarding middle east, there has been coordinated disruptive<\/strong> behavior to remove this connection probably by people associated with Mizrahi developments.\n<\/p>\n – I think lowering the block to 48 hours on the condition that any further disruptive<\/strong> activity will result in an immediate re-instating of the previous block time is therefore appropriate.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – All evidence does seem to point to a disruptive<\/strong> editor pushing a personal objective and PoV.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – The project could benefit from a few edit filters to reduce disruptive<\/strong> editing.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – They are disruptive<\/strong> and a block may be appropriate.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Some wikis are even available to people without an account, so sometimes wikis will become a target for vandals to add unwelcome, disruptive<\/strong> or even misleading content.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I’ve not got time to scour through to find them all now, but this user has becoming pretty disruptive<\/strong> recently, and I wouldn’t say that a short-term ban would be too far at this moment in time.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Can admins sign out and edit as an ip to protect pages? Please see this example here Is that just fake protecting by an editor? In the summaries the editor falsely implies there was disruptive<\/strong> editing to the article.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Just lately, he has become increasingly disruptive<\/strong> on this project, posting absurd comments such as,,.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – It is very important to recognize “patterns” of disruptive<\/strong> changing.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – The ability to block disruptive<\/strong> users and delete pages would be very helpful for me.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I am seeing a pattern of disruptive<\/strong> editing here.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – If necessary, disruptive<\/strong> editors should be blocked rather than preventing improvements by other users.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – An account with a username that indicates that they are trying to be disruptive<\/strong><\/strong>, uses hateful or obscene language or otherwise shows that the user has disruptive<\/strong><\/strong> or provocative intent will be hard blocked, meaning that an unblock request will be required.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – A:When the user has performed a lot of vandalism or very disruptive<\/strong> editing it is allowed to release the information to a third-party.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n![\"disruptive](\"https:\/\/englishteststore.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/disruptive-example-sentences.jpg\" "\\"disruptive")
Example sentences of “disruptive”:<\/h2>\n