<\/p>\n
– This is a stub<\/strong> for improvement, not advertising for deletion.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – As you might already know, we have a new project, WikiProject Stub<\/strong> Eradication.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Initially, only very few stub<\/strong> types should be created for common topics such as writers, actors, bio’s, etcetera.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – This lets someone interested in working on specific stub<\/strong> types locate them more easily.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – That’s why I’m asking you once more to join Wikiproject Stub<\/strong> Eradication and help me and others out.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Use the definition I gave, to see if an article is a stub<\/strong><\/strong>; the stub<\/strong><\/strong> tag may be missing, it may also be on articles that do no meet the definition above.\n<\/p>\n – Note: There is currently a bug, that adds the stub<\/strong> template even after the metadata.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – We don’t need the stub<\/strong> categories to mirror the main content categories.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Completely unsourced stub<\/strong> about something that seems to make no sense.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – It doesn’t show options for tagging, stub<\/strong> sort, etc.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – The word stub<\/strong> means something that is very short.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I propose to create a new template stub<\/strong> for internet domains -.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – New module for add stub<\/strong> templates to article.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – So I was wondering if we could set a limit of what a stub<\/strong> article is, I’d say 3000 bytes to be the maximum limit.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – The stub<\/strong><\/strong> tab will tag the page with one more stub<\/strong><\/strong> template of your choice.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – New stub<\/strong> types need to be addressed on the talk page before creating.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I was wondering about a stub<\/strong> sorting bot.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – If you are worried about scaring people away because the stub<\/strong> was clearly done in good faith, then drop them a line and advise them it needs to be longer, otherwise it will be deleted.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Creating a stub<\/strong> before moving to the next.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Both classifications put the three African genera “Colobus”, “Piliocolobus”, and “Procolobus” in one group; these genera are distinct because they have stub<\/strong> thumbs.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I’ve expanded this stub<\/strong> significantly and it now meets all CA criteria.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – These two IPs, probably the same person and both tracing to University of California, Berkeley, have created a number of poor and unreferenced stub<\/strong> articles on Greek literary concepts.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Perhaps head “behind the scenes” and work on things that are often neglected by others, such as categorisation, stub<\/strong> sorting etc.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – This is the main stub<\/strong> template.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Do not add it if the link currently leads to the equivalent of a stub<\/strong> entry, or just a bare placeholder.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Please use a simple, one-line stub<\/strong> message, if needed, but don’t make it into a project.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – One approach might be to look at the people who received a Nobel prize for their work, in the last 100 years, and make sure we have at least a stub<\/strong> on all of them.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I simply do not understand the problem with stub<\/strong><\/strong>s – sure they are frustrating, but a simple stub<\/strong><\/strong> is better than nothing.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I have started a stub<\/strong> on the current Translation of the week, Cult suicide, but it still needs a category.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – We don’t have “just about any stub<\/strong> under the sun”.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – When I first came across that article, it was an inaccurate 1-line stub<\/strong> article.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – The idea of the cup is to promote stub<\/strong><\/strong> expanding, by rewarding users for expanding stub<\/strong><\/strong>s to regular, good and very good articles.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – The Simple Stub<\/strong> Project is essentially a project to determine when a new stub<\/strong> type should be created.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I think there should be a stub<\/strong> for video games.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – We have two history stub<\/strong> types, History and Nazi.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – What we have so far is a 2-3 sentence stub<\/strong> about a school.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Any objections? I’d like to start fixing and adding info to a number of stub<\/strong> pages and this seems the most sensible idea.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Once we know that we can then see that most of these 3000 articles do not require the stub<\/strong><\/strong> tag or we could have a “stub<\/strong><\/strong> drive”, focused at getting articles to a state where they no longer need the tag.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – However, I must note that when someone expands a stub<\/strong> for the competition, they should add truthful content, verified, preferably by third-party reliable sources.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Join the stub<\/strong> eradication team if you are serious about improving quality.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Having a small stub<\/strong> provides readers with basic information.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – But if you have copied the stub<\/strong> it should be attributed, even if you have then simplified or changed it.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – My brother GoblinBot2 is planning on becoming more active again, mainly in the area of stub<\/strong> replacement.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – In the last few days, I spent my time here fixing the red-links in the article; so the substances listed either have a stub<\/strong> article, or they are a redirect.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – What we do have is a 2-3 sentence stub<\/strong> with an infobox and a filmography.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – This allows specifying between two and six stub<\/strong> types at a time.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – It’s also not seen as useful to have a stub<\/strong> type if no one is specifically working on the articles in it.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I do not see how it can be an advert and should be acceptable for a stub<\/strong> on the topic, but I do see how it is now totally in violation of policy to post it in main space as it has been made impossible to attribute the base edits it was written from due to the deletion.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Finally, a reminder that new stub<\/strong> types\/templates\/categories need to be approved before being used.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I have made to to bring attention to the fact that unapproved stub<\/strong> templates will be deleted.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – So if we have two stub<\/strong> tags, go up the cat hierarchy to the level where both cats meet, ie.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – For people with professional backgrounds in typesetting, this essay is not intended as a joke, but rather, an advancement over the default typesetting of stub<\/strong> articles.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – While going through articles, it is easy to come across a stub<\/strong><\/strong> that falls under multiple stub<\/strong><\/strong> categories.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Quickly wrote a stub<\/strong> abput it.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I think there is an error with Twinkle’s stub<\/strong> adding function.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Fllowing the discussion, I propose to start the discussion on what a stub<\/strong> actually is.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Does a page such as Chusquea albilanata belong in the Simple WP? Though unnoted as such, it’s apparently an exact copy of :w:Chusquea albilanata though with a more general parent category and no Stub<\/strong> template or Infobox.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – If there is more than one stub<\/strong> type that applies to an article, you can use the template.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Weak keep, looks like a stub<\/strong> that needs cleanup, also to me it looks like it does meet.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n![\"stub](\"https:\/\/englishteststore.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/stub-some-sentence-examples.jpg\" "\\"stub")
Example sentences of “stub”:<\/h2>\n
- Note: There is currently a bug, that adds the stub<\/strong> template even after the metadata.\r\n
- We don't need the stub<\/strong> categories to mirror the main content categories.\r\n
- Completely unsourced stub<\/strong> about something that seems to make no sense.\r\n
<\/pre>\nMore in-sentence examples of “stub”:<\/h2>\n
- If you are worried about scaring people away because the stub<\/strong> was clearly done in good faith, then drop them a line and advise them it needs to be longer, otherwise it will be deleted.\r\n
- Creating a stub<\/strong> before moving to the next.\r\n
- Both classifications put the three African genera \"Colobus\", \"Piliocolobus\", and \"Procolobus\" in one group; these genera are distinct because they have stub<\/strong> thumbs.\r\n
<\/pre>\n