<\/p>\n
+ This will aid in clean-up, I know is currently a sysop<\/strong><\/strong> level access, so there might be some arguments that why not flag down any sysop<\/strong><\/strong> or GR, but I think if we can trust them with rollback, we can with this and if anyone misuse, it can be easily removed and the redirect can be reinstated without much trouble.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Often beating me to revert, tagging etc, he’s done a lot of good work here since January, and I think SysOp<\/strong> tools will help his work here further.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + From a technical point of view, it is better to say that bureaucrat’s cannot delete\/protect\/block, and they only can promote other users to sysop<\/strong> or bureaucrat level, and can rename user accounts, and grant falgs to bot accounts.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + I’d like to thank Fr33kman for the nomination and for believing in me and that I am able to re-gain the sysop<\/strong> flag.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + I’ve been a sysop<\/strong> for a few months now.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + I’ve checked his other user accounts on other wikis, but he only has sysop<\/strong> rights in here.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + I would like to nominate myself for a CheckUser, I’m also a sysop<\/strong> and a bureaucrat here but I think that I could help more with CU flag.\n<\/p>\n + So he obviously knows what is needed for Sysop<\/strong> privileges.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + That said, I repeat I’m okay with removing sysop<\/strong> perms from an admin account which hasn’t been used for a long time.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Would any roaming sysop<\/strong> please import a fresh copy of Template:Infobox person when able? I want to start working on fixing the deprecated errors and have learned it’s best to start with a fresh import.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + I suggest extending the creation protection of Ali Sarhan shamran and similar articles to sysop<\/strong> for a period of time, as the new socks simply edit their userpage and wait to be confirmed.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Please remove my sysop<\/strong> tools to prevent any future nefarious actions on this account.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + But I would like to be considered to be granted the Sysop<\/strong> tools in the “future”.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Being a sysop<\/strong> is not a “power” or a “position”, but it is not merely a “different level of access” as well.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + After the debacle of the Razorflame RfA, sorry Razor, I made it my bussiness to learn all the rules in case I ever wanted to apply for sysop<\/strong> privileges, so I think I know the rules well enough.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + The specific tabs displayed on your pages depend on whether or not you are logged into the wiki and whether you have sysop<\/strong> privileges on the wiki.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + This is why it is important to leave a blocked user able to edit their talk page, or able to email a sysop<\/strong> just in case a mistake was made.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + I was wondering if I could propose some edits to the abuse filter in a Google Doc or something and an admin could add them to the filter? I am familiar with the text you must use as I am sysop<\/strong> on another wiki that uses abuse filter.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + If a user page was deleted because an editor left, it may be restored by a sysop<\/strong> if the editor comes back, particularly if the history contains evidence of policy violations.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Here’s why he should be granted the Sysop<\/strong> flag, he has at least 50, most of which are QD tags.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + But I think that he is still worthy to keep his sysop<\/strong> tools and still edits occassionally.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + If a sysop<\/strong> disagrees about restoring, please at least paste-copy the last version in my own page to give me a last chance to improve it.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Of course, if they do, we can always give them the bit back, but for now, I don’t see the need for users who have retired to keep their sysop<\/strong> bit.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + I am a trusted user on simpleWP and am both a sysop<\/strong> and a bureaucrat here.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Any meta sysop<\/strong> can edit the Wikimedia-wide spam blacklist to add or remove the words that are recognized by the filter, with the changes taking effect immediately.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Weak Oppose Do we need to get every editor from EN WP over here and give them sysop<\/strong> tools? Cometstyles? Come on.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + The extra powers of a sysop<\/strong> user are intended for use in settling disputes and preventing repeated vandalism.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + While I believe that he won’t abuse any of his sysop<\/strong> tools if he gets them, and could further improve this wiki.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Editors who only revert vandalism don’t need the sysop<\/strong> tools, because they are already doing a good job.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + I think that Griffin is a net positive as an editor and his promotion to sysop<\/strong> would bring some much needed flavor into the ranks.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + I suggest an independent, uninvolved sysop<\/strong> determine if consensus is obtained in 7 days.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + I don’t think he would ever abuse his sysop<\/strong> tools and could further help contributing in this wiki with extra tools.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + I’m an admin of this wiki from 5 month and I never abuse of sysop<\/strong> tools.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + I have not used Simple for very long but I would like sysop<\/strong> rights to help delete the many pages that I see go for a significant amount of time without being deleted.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + As a sysop<\/strong> you must make this choice, and wield your power responsibly.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + I also think that if he is granted sysop<\/strong> tools, he could monitor vandalism while the other admins are offline.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + I am inviting the community to grant the sysop<\/strong> flag to BG7.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + I have decided to co-nominate to be granted the Sysop<\/strong> flag.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Do you guys feel you have adequate sysop<\/strong><\/strong> manpower these days? I’ve been less active around here than I used to be, but I’m also a pretty experienced sysop<\/strong><\/strong> now.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + I’m an active user and sysop<\/strong> on :nl: and I’ll work on adding interwiki’s on :nds-nl:.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + I think I will be a great sysop<\/strong> because I have a lot of free time to be here, will be tough on vandalism, and am not tolerant of people being rude.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + With us now being about half way through 2009, i’ve also had a look back at the predictions that I made in our, the flood flag has been enabled, and GBots 3 and 4 have both been brought online – albeit with some problems, and not as was originally intended! There have also been no less than 16 Sysop<\/strong> promotions – of which one was mine and one was a re-promotion, 3 Bureaucrat promotions, and 2 CheckUser promotions.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Deleting a page is a straightforward operation for anyone with sysop<\/strong> permissions.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + I’ll probably end myself this vote for the third time at midnight because not a single sysop<\/strong> will dare oppose story.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Only a user with sysop<\/strong> permissions can edit a protected page.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + If it is, please tell a sysop<\/strong> on the m:main pagemeta-wiki; they can put in a Wikimedia-wide text filter.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + I haven’t reported a vandal to VIP ever since getting the sysop<\/strong> tools; I block on sight after they vandalize after their fourth warning.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + I am a rollbacker on and a sysop<\/strong> on.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + The reason I’m happy to stand and nominate IWI is I believe they’ve genuinely demonstrated a willingness to learn, dedication to the project, and the competence necessary to be a great sysop<\/strong> here.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + At the same time, he was recently promoted to sysop<\/strong> over at the simple english wikitionary.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + The last time I ran to be a sysop<\/strong> I learned a lot about policies and guidlines and since then I have spent a lot of time trying to learn them.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Nomination by Razorflame: Today, I would like to present Djsasso to the community for the sysop<\/strong> flag.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + I propose to enable the ability for our local crats to be able to remove the sysop<\/strong> flag.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + We should give everybody sysop<\/strong> tools if Cometstyles gets this.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + A sysop<\/strong> will then delete it after checking that the page does not have evidence of policy violations that may need to be kept.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + If there has been no disruptive behavior meriting the retention of that personal information, then the sysop<\/strong> can delete the page straight away in order to eliminate general public distribution of the history containing the information.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + I think we should remove their sysop<\/strong> rights, but reinstate them when they return and feel like editing full-time again.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Why keep the sysop<\/strong> flag from me if you really believe that I could use the tools to their fullest potential? I do not believe that I am still leaping into situations without thinking anymore.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Could it possibly be either changed to “Edit: Autoconfirmed Move: Sysop<\/strong><\/strong><\/strong>” or “Edit: Sysop<\/strong><\/strong><\/strong> Move: Sysop<\/strong><\/strong><\/strong> ” so that I can edit.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Comppro request as one of his\/her first edits sysop<\/strong> rights on simple and tried it on en, too.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Stewards can give sysop<\/strong> right on projects where there are no local bureaucrate.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n![\"sysop](\"https:\/\/englishteststore.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/sysop-example-sentences.jpg\" "\\"sysop")
Example sentences of “sysop”:<\/h2>\n
+ So he obviously knows what is needed for Sysop<\/strong> privileges.\r\n
+ That said, I repeat I'm okay with removing sysop<\/strong> perms from an admin account which hasn't been used for a long time.\r\n
<\/pre>\nMore in-sentence examples of “sysop”:<\/h2>\n
+ If a sysop<\/strong> disagrees about restoring, please at least paste-copy the last version in my own page to give me a last chance to improve it.\r\n
+ Of course, if they do, we can always give them the bit back, but for now, I don't see the need for users who have retired to keep their sysop<\/strong> bit.\r\n
<\/pre>\n