<\/p>\n
– There is an active request for deletion<\/strong> for Shazir mucklai, but at least one person is repeatedly removing the RfD template\/link from the article.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – It may express mutant proteins, such as deletion<\/strong> mutations or missense mutations.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – This sequence is still used humorously for epanorthosis by computer literates, denoting the deletion<\/strong> of a pretended blunder, much like a strikethrough.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – The outcome of this WP:RFDrequest for deletion<\/strong> was to redirect to microphone per WP:SNOW.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I am asking about deletion<\/strong> here, because I think debate upon the usefulness of these pages should not be spread over 200-300 ‘Articles For Deletion<\/strong>‘ pages.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I would like to add a clause that states that a user should know how to revert changes to a page, and also that candidates know how to use the Quick Deletion<\/strong> and RfD tags.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – An IP address has proposed the deletion<\/strong> of a section from the article Lysergic acid diethylamide.\n<\/p>\n – I believe under the current quick deletion<\/strong> policy, admins are entitled to delete very short stubs, usually referred to as “one-liners”.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I tend not to request for deletion<\/strong> of such articles, but this time, this is “very” far from our definition of core articles.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I removed the deletion<\/strong> because there was a note saying I can remove it.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Hello, I would like the deletion<\/strong> of the article Jonas Lohrmann to be checked here.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – So I have brought it here for deletion<\/strong> instead.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Now that the simple english wiktionary is off its vote for deletion<\/strong> and has over 1,000 entries, I think we should begin to begin to weave the projects together.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – When a deletion<\/strong> needs to be made, the whole CD needs to be erased.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Delete I’ve tagged for speedy deletion<\/strong> for A1, little or no meaning.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – There have been many discussions about deletion<\/strong> or moving complex chemistry articles fron namespace back into userspace.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Anyway, you can check the deletion<\/strong> log of Camera and video camera…\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – The deletion<\/strong> of these articles is more a matter of notability than subject matter.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – This has been nominated already with the deletion<\/strong> tag, but has not been mentioned on here.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I believe that this request for deletion<\/strong> is unjustified.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Anyway, I guess deletion<\/strong> is in order.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I am nominating this article for deletion<\/strong> because I don’t think the article meets WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Rather than create a Request for Deletion<\/strong> for each article affected, I wanted to see if we could agree here to follow the redirect recommendation.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I thought that IPs could contribute to discussions by making comments, but they were not allowed to vote in requests for permissions, deletion<\/strong> and similar things.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Everything else has been a revert or deletion<\/strong> nomination.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – EulerObama “has nominated this page for deletion<\/strong> for the reason:” Do not meet WP:Notability criteria.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – We’ve done a lot to reduce this number through mass deletion<\/strong> in recent times, but there are still an awful lot of them out there and this needs to change.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I have experience with the admin duties, deletion<\/strong> of pages, blocking of users, protection etc and would like to carry out tasks here.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I a recently created article for deletion<\/strong> at RFD because at first quick glance, it didn’t appear valid to me.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – The focus is to discuss the potential deletion<\/strong> or rewriting of an entire section, rather than the editing of a few phrases scattered in an article.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I sincerely hope that these clarifications and amends will be sufficient to wave the deletion<\/strong> demand as I do not see anything in contradiction with the wiki guidelines.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – If prompting user for deletion<\/strong> reason, just display a link.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – In such a case, the page should be undeleted and listed on for a period of five days following the deletion<\/strong> of the user page.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Hence I am puzzled at the existence of this deletion<\/strong> discussion.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Don’t use this template on any page which doesn’t have a quick deletion<\/strong> tag.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I didn’t request of quick deletion<\/strong> of the other three, and decided to request others to comment about them.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – If an article is being moved to userspace to avoid deletion<\/strong> and then moved using the move button.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Given that the person we are talking aobut is just 9 years old, I’d opt for deletion<\/strong> though.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – This is the first time I have participated in a deletion<\/strong> discussion on Simple, so I hope I am doing it correctly.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – There are alternatives to deletion<\/strong> also.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – At least one of the other deletion<\/strong> criteria must still apply to the page, and you must make mention of this in your rationale.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – As they do not fall under A4, an RfD is needed to see if there is consensus to refer back to for deletion<\/strong> of non-notable storms and give the admins a bit of leeway in the matter.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – RfD is the appropriate method for deletion<\/strong> at that point.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – For some reason I can’t rollback the deletion<\/strong> of Universe.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – The user continually recreates articles with non-notable subjects and articles going through deletion<\/strong> processes, user continually recreates articles and assumes they’re in good standing with the community through various article creation requests.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I can’t support deletion<\/strong> with banned contributor.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – One last thing: you were advised to “invite” the editors who previously commented on the various deletion<\/strong> discussions for this article.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I will do the article deletion<\/strong> tomorrow, unless someone else does.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I feel that the whole deletion<\/strong> process will be much cleaner and neater if sysops on this wiki are able to set the flood flag on themselves.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Sju hav suggested I try opening deletion<\/strong> discussions on them, but I want to see the community’s view on these articles.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – In a “indirect” way, I have found that there “is now” an ongoing deletion<\/strong> discussion.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I felt so strongly about this, I had to use a test account to sockpuppeteer in a deletion<\/strong> vote.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I’ve had quite a bit of experience with speedy deletion<\/strong><\/strong> tagging, RC patrol, and also deletion<\/strong><\/strong> discussion.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I believe that I have been correctly tagging articles for deletion<\/strong> that need it; I also believe that I have learned about blocking.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Support deletion<\/strong> – Agree with nominator’s comment, way too specific.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I’d support a discussion regarding updating of the revision deletion<\/strong> policy, but I am definitely opposed to continuing this as a heated debate.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – If the deletion<\/strong> goes through, I will eliminate the shortcut for BE 1500 in the target article.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – How would other admins have treated the QD request? Obviously that sentence in the deletion<\/strong> policy which simply says should be clarified after this discussion.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – The outcome of this Deletion<\/strong> Review is the previous RfD is.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n![\"How](\"https:\/\/englishteststore.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/How-to-use-the-word-deletion.jpg\" "\\"How")
Example sentences of “deletion”:<\/h2>\n
- I believe under the current quick deletion<\/strong> policy, admins are entitled to delete very short stubs, usually referred to as \"one-liners\".\r\n
- I tend not to request for deletion<\/strong> of such articles, but this time, this is \"very\" far from our definition of core articles.\r\n
- I removed the deletion<\/strong> because there was a note saying I can remove it.\r\n
<\/pre>\nMore in-sentence examples of “deletion”:<\/h2>\n
- The deletion<\/strong> of these articles is more a matter of notability than subject matter.\r\n
- This has been nominated already with the deletion<\/strong> tag, but has not been mentioned on here.\r\n
- I believe that this request for deletion<\/strong> is unjustified.\r\n
<\/pre>\n