<\/p>\n
+ Over the last 3 weeks or so, the IP range has been inserting what appears to be subtle vandalism<\/strong> in the form of random es interwiki links and\/or links to newly created TV channels.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + In cases of long-term vandalism<\/strong> from an IP address, consider blocks over a period of months or years instead.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Signature templates are vandalism<\/strong> targets, and will be forever, even if the user leaves the project.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Porcelain might need a protection, also a fix as some of the vandalism<\/strong> were mixed up through time.\n<\/p>\n + There will likely be more vandalism<\/strong> on this page from IPs due to recent events.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + I am requesting you to take action and protect the article in the right version and not allow vandalism<\/strong> in it anymore.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + There has been a lot of vandalism<\/strong> from different IPs on pages about U.S.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Many of the regulars here have reverted vandalism<\/strong> on that page at least once these past few weeks.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Not only will it be deleted again, but repeatedly submitting the same page is usually seen as a form of vandalism<\/strong> and a user could be is the preferred action.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Still, it seems to be getting constant trolling and vandalism<\/strong> from IP editors.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + The protection expired and the vandalism<\/strong> continued again.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + I’m not quite back to the level of focusing my attention here as much as I used to, though I do pop by every once and a while to check the recent changes, and I’ve run across a bit of vandalism<\/strong> here and there that I’ve been able to tag for deletion, but would rather do myself.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Not only have I been reverting vandalism<\/strong> here but I also have been creating articles, marking pages for deletion, and doing regular wiki maintenance work.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Can I request that Template:Disclaimer-header becomes protected? It’s used on each of the and so it’s definitely a good idea to reduce the risk of vandalism<\/strong> so we can’t get sued :D.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Additionally, despite my very clear and concise objection, this user has taken it upon themselves to more or less threaten the deletion, as stated Aside from this, I’ll note that there have been several questionable RD’s of basic vandalism<\/strong> that certainly do not meet Simple’s own RD policy.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + High level of vandalism<\/strong> lately, both IP and user.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + This IP may need to be monitored closely for continuing vandalism<\/strong> as well as all of its contributions rechecked for validity.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Our editors had reverted his vandalism<\/strong> 17 times over this period.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + When you undo vandalism<\/strong> that contains profanity or other truly offensive things, feel free to drop us a line to ask us to use revdel.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Have a look at the changes made after the recent vandalism<\/strong> in the history.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Would the implementations work? Activity would be slowed, but vandalism<\/strong> would be eradicated.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + It basically should be used when general vandalism<\/strong> occurs, not test edits when using.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + They help out in our DYK area, participate in discussions and revert vandalism<\/strong> – everything an admin needs to be.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + While most of the borderline vandalism<\/strong> is under control thanks to Chris G Bot and a few other vandal patrollers, it does create spam and unnecessary used up space in the new changes page.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + I came to your aide upon request from your community via the steward chat-channel and was given temporary blocking access because of my knowledge of cross-wiki vandalism<\/strong> and ranges.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + I do understand that this should only be used for obvious spams and vandalism<\/strong> and that it’s a privilege.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Add into the mix the sheer volume of vandalism<\/strong> that I’ve reverted and the sheer amount of correctly placed QD tags that I’ve put onto articles, as well as the massive amount of Barnstars that I have recieved, and I think that you can safely say that I am ready for the flag.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + She has done some vandalism<\/strong> cleaning up, QD tagging, article writing, and even article saving.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Because of the Alex Rodriguez scandal that is in the news right now, I would like to propose that his article here be semi-protected temporarily for a period of a few days as both a preventative measure and because I know that there will be vandalism<\/strong> to his article here.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Hello! I am Krett12, master ClueHuman vandalism<\/strong><\/strong> revert-er! I am aware that I do not meet *some* criteria such as the several hundred edit requirement, however, I believe I would be a good exception because I am a skilled vandalism<\/strong><\/strong> revert-er, and there have been at least a dozen times where I have needed an admin and not had one.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + As you will know, we get a lot of vandalism<\/strong> from schools.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + In particular, how should repeat vandals and serious vandalism<\/strong> \/ personal attacks be dealt with? The discussion is at WP:AN#Empty threats?.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + There may be sleeper socks around, not to mention that the vandalism<\/strong> around here seemed to be worse than usual.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Furthermore, I like seeing future administrator candidates to have more vandalism<\/strong><\/strong> reversions as this goes to show that you do indeed know how to revert vandalism<\/strong><\/strong>.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Prevention “is” better than cure, so we wouldn’t want to risk excessive vandalism<\/strong> with no one to take action.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + I blocked the above 3 accounts as Vandalism<\/strong> Only Accounts and suspected socks and would like confirmation if possible.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Today, I found an IP editor who maked heavy vandalism<\/strong><\/strong>, and I want to quickly block the user to prevent further vandalism<\/strong><\/strong> by this user.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + From my personal experience with admin\/antivandal bots safely detecting general vandalism<\/strong><\/strong> is much much harder than just serial vandalism<\/strong><\/strong>.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Also, if this has been sparked by the amount of IP vandalism<\/strong> which has need oversighting, this is definitely not the solution.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + As you should all know, the Protect tool is meant to be preventative, not punative, and this action was clearly unsolicited when the amount of vandalism<\/strong> points only to a block of the IP editor involved.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Could someone please protect this page? Lots of vandalism<\/strong> from IPs.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + There is a lot of vandalism<\/strong> on this article all of a sudden coming from various IPs.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Both appear to be vandalism<\/strong><\/strong> only accounts created shortly between each other and share overlapping interests in editing the same articles\/same vandalism<\/strong><\/strong>.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + A block may be needed, either for vandalism<\/strong> and\/or block evasion.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + No more bickering, no more attacking each other, no more complaining about each other, no more accusing each other of vandalism<\/strong> or anything else.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + There has been constant and consistent vandalism<\/strong> to the page from IP editors with no other history.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + I have gone through every diff in that window and reverted any vandalism<\/strong> accordingly.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + The copy cows are regularly the subject of vandalism<\/strong> – some more creative than others: in 2012 the cows were all painted to appear as skeletons by a local guerrilla artist in readiness for Halloween.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + When a user submits an edit to a page, MediaWiki writes it to the database, but without deleting the previous versions of the page, thus allowing easy reverts in case of vandalism<\/strong> or spamming.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + The content is accurate, but the tone and the fact that it is so obvious what it says seems like vandalism<\/strong> to me.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + I actively fight vandalism<\/strong> and patrol new pages.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + The situation is that we get “many” bad new pages and edits which are either vandalism<\/strong> or incompetent.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Again though, vandalism<\/strong> is a big deal here, and there is a shortage of admins.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + He has vandalized “both” my U-Page and my talk page, but luckily the vandalism<\/strong> was reverted.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + I am trying to undo that vandalism<\/strong> but can’t revert the move to put things back the way they were as the redirect was overwritten by some other content preventing the move back.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + I would note that other similar cases were gone for a year or more when no sock puppetry or vandalism<\/strong> was involved.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + If you want to become an administrator, I would like to see more vandal reversions as well as more reports to the ViP page and warnings to the vandals that you reverted appropriately, as this goes to show that you have read and understand the vandalism<\/strong> guidelines here on this site.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + The tools are very important for me, to fighting vandalism<\/strong><\/strong> and reduise time for undo a vandalism<\/strong><\/strong>-change.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + This matter drew the attention of RTG, who chose to “award” me a “Vandalism<\/strong> Barnstar” on the grounds that I “don’t understand what vandalism<\/strong> is”, and “confused” him.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + The page Funny Face has been attracting large amounts of vandalism<\/strong> for sometime now.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + This is annoying, especially as I’d like to revert some vandalism<\/strong> here and Recent Changes is my main way of doing so.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + One of the main reasons I’m running is to help fight vandalism<\/strong><\/strong>; there only seem to be four or five active admins, and I’ve encountered more than one occasion where vandalism<\/strong><\/strong> from one or more users is just rampant and there’s no admin around to block them and delete any nonsense pages they started.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Hello, MauchoEagle here, I am requesting rollback to help in the obstruction of vandalism<\/strong> on this developing project.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Considering its topic, it’s also prone to vandalism<\/strong> for SEO services.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n![\"Some](\"https:\/\/englishteststore.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/Some-in-sentence-examples-of-vandalism.jpg\" "\\"Some")
Example sentences of “vandalism”:<\/h2>\n
+ There will likely be more vandalism<\/strong> on this page from IPs due to recent events.\r\n
+ I am requesting you to take action and protect the article in the right version and not allow vandalism<\/strong> in it anymore.\r\n
+ There has been a lot of vandalism<\/strong> from different IPs on pages about U.S.\r\n
<\/pre>\nMore in-sentence examples of “vandalism”:<\/h2>\n
+ I came to your aide upon request from your community via the steward chat-channel and was given temporary blocking access because of my knowledge of cross-wiki vandalism<\/strong> and ranges.\r\n
+ I do understand that this should only be used for obvious spams and vandalism<\/strong> and that it's a privilege.\r\n
+ Add into the mix the sheer volume of vandalism<\/strong> that I've reverted and the sheer amount of correctly placed QD tags that I've put onto articles, as well as the massive amount of Barnstars that I have recieved, and I think that you can safely say that I am ready for the flag.\r\n
<\/pre>\n