<\/p>\n
– I think the criteria<\/strong> should be updated accordingly.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – With most contests the criteria<\/strong> for judging is physical appearance, plus some judgement of personality.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Can’t believe how unfair the deletion criteria<\/strong> are.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – If the community agrees on adding this new section, I’ll start working right away on the DYK pages needed for this, along with the criteria<\/strong> for DYK I will propose that we can discuss.\n<\/p>\n – I think this only misses criteria<\/strong><\/strong> 6 of the GA criteria<\/strong><\/strong> in its current form.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Note: It is probably less work to get a GA to meet VGA criteria<\/strong> than it is to get a regular article there; despite this, both ways are left open.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Secondly, there will still many outstanding issues in the article – perhaps more than I suggested in my closing statement – and considering a criteria<\/strong> for both VGA and GA is that the article shouldn’t undergo lots of changes recently it seemed appropriate to close instead of leaving it running or giving it a ‘no-consensus’ extension.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – The second factor is that the club needs to meet criteria<\/strong> set by the higher league.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – This is a notification that there is a proposal to change the criteria<\/strong> of the inactive administrators policy.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I believe I meet the requirements stated of the criteria<\/strong> for adminship and I believe I have the trust of the community for me to become an.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – One of the criteria<\/strong> most commonly used by micronations is the Montevideo Convention.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – In each round, the bids are evaluated: If certain criteria<\/strong> are met, the auction is stopped and one bidder will buy the item at the specified price.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Google’s Advanced Search web form gives several additional fields which may be used to qualify searches by such criteria<\/strong> as date of first retrieval.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – It can be used for articles which meet at least half the criteria<\/strong> needed, and which are listed on respective peer review page.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – In addition to PageRank, Google over the years has added many other secret criteria<\/strong> for determining the ranking of pages on result lists, reported to be over 200 different indicators.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – It seems as if general consensus here is keeping the criteria<\/strong> at the 800 character rule, or in other words, we keep it as is.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Do we want looser notability criteria<\/strong> for movies than enwiki? For example, if a movie has one or more major movie stars in it, is that enough? Please let me know your thoughts.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – The criteria<\/strong> for authorization has four broad categories: “safety” “freedom of choice” “labelling” and “traceability”.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – It’s an assortment of short biographical descriptions with no clear inclusion criteria<\/strong> or purpose.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I also can’t find any right criteria<\/strong> of the QD to ask for quick deletion.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Additionally, the direct conversion fuel cells use has less risk of producing secondary emissions like NOx, SOx, and particulate matter, which are side effects of combustion, contribute to global warming, and are known as criteria<\/strong> pollutants.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – However, even the modified 2002 CDC criteria<\/strong> do not identify women with subclinical disease.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I’ve gone through the article, linked and simplified where possible and checked the whole thing off against the criteria<\/strong> – I believe the article meets all of them already, it just needs some fresh eyes to ensure it’s not too complex.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Economic criteria<\/strong> are usually seen as most important.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Recently, the election of Bureaucrat criteria<\/strong> was changed so that candidates who get the support of two current crats are automatically promoted.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Hackers should be judged by their hacking, not bogus criteria<\/strong> such as degrees, age, race,or position.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – All articles on albums, singles or songs must meet the basic criteria<\/strong> at the notability guidelines, with important coverage in of the subject.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – In order to become a very good article, there are certain criteria<\/strong> that the article must meet.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Last night, Oklahoma was yesterday as VGA as it met the current criteria<\/strong> for WP:VGA, i.e.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Hello community; Our current GA and VGA have some criteria<\/strong> they must meet, before they can be promoted to the respective level.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – The drawback of meeting such a set of criteria<\/strong> is usually that querying certain data from the database will become more difficult.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – During 2008, the Roundtable developed a series of principles and criteria<\/strong> for sustainable biofuels production through meetings, teleconferences, and online discussions.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I believe the article now meets the criteria<\/strong> for GA.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I’ve noticed that the criteria<\/strong> for GA and VGA are defined as “guidelines” not “policy”.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – If you as the community believe that this status is also about such things, we should modify the criteria<\/strong> to reflect that.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – These criteria<\/strong> are often about having the right facilities and finances.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Coffee is one of our Good Articles that I think meets more than half of the current criteria<\/strong> for VGA status, however, it does not meet all of them.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – In 1994, the S-Box design criteria<\/strong> were finally published by its designers after the public rediscovery of differential cryptanalysis, showing that they had been carefully tuned the design to increase resistance against differential cryptanalysis attacks.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Okay I’m going to say it again here instead of following on from Hydriz’s vote: Why does the criteria<\/strong><\/strong> say three months if actually no-one will get the tools unless they have twice as much, or four times as much? I can’t understand the ‘too soon’ votes as I meet the criteria<\/strong><\/strong> set out by this community.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – There was a long discussion, criteria<\/strong> for very good articles.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – The Criteria<\/strong> for adminship is a very successful guideline we have.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – The DSM IVDSM-IV-TR or the ICD-10 criteria<\/strong> are used to determine whether a person has schizophrenia.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – While the main criteria<\/strong> for marriage changed, among the most important were physical attractiveness and education.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Furthermore, there is no consensus to promote the article, nor is there any consensus nor criteria<\/strong> for having ‘Good Lists’.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – The criteria<\/strong> for certification were changed as of January 1, 2001.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – However, ultimately, it is up to you to determine if an article is up to scratch or not by reading through the PGA criteria<\/strong> and then determining whether each one is met or not.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Although the article is rather young, and has mostly been completed by one user, it is very well written, and meets all the WP:VGOOD criteria<\/strong> except number 5.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I would suggest you look at the criteria<\/strong> again if you are uncertain about how an RfA works.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – As for “skirting the intent of criteria<\/strong><\/strong> 7″, well you need to fix the criteria<\/strong><\/strong> if you are likely to start opposing on the existence of short stubs “as well as” redlinks.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – The page should not be deleted based on A7 notability criteria<\/strong> because this person is very notable as a media personality in his own country.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Sometimes a good article is changed in such a way that it no longer meets the criteria<\/strong> above, or new information may become available about the topic, making the article incomplete.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – LDC criteria<\/strong> are reviewed every three years.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I am aware this is third of its type but that should not affect the voting – if it meets the criteria<\/strong> then there shouldn’t be a problem.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Our list has the same problems, and the inclusion criteria<\/strong> is very unclear.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – The most common criteria<\/strong> is when a player has scored 3 goals in a match.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I would propose the criteria<\/strong> be ten edits, with at least half to the mainspace.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – There is, however, a precedent that was set with the promotion of the sub-stub Tropical Depression Ten article: if everything is done right, and all criteria<\/strong> are met, then the article should get the gold star, so long as all information available to the reader is presented in the article.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – As far as I’m concerned this article now meets the criteria<\/strong> for a good article.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – After recruiting Adam Gaynor from Criteria<\/strong> Recording Studios in Miami and Kyle Cook from the Atlanta Institute of Music, the band named themselves “Matchbox 20” and won a recording contract with Atlantic Records.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – The list below has an image of the site or part of the site; the name; the location; the nominating state party; the criteria<\/strong> met by the site, including if it is a cultural, natural or mixed; the area in hectares and acres; the year the site was added; and a description of the site.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – A few of us discussed this criteria<\/strong> over IRC on Tuesday night, and most of us were in favor of bringing it back.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Editors are encouraged to review usage of the infobox, and to remove questionable content from the field if it is not well sourced or if the decisions that led to inclusion or exclusion of some group in that field was based on WP:OR considerations regarding the weighting of diverging criteria<\/strong> regarding “relatedness”.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – The Daintree Rainforest meets all four natural criteria<\/strong> on the “Criteria<\/strong> for Selection to be a World Heritage Site”.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Majorly, you said we “removed the speedy criteria<\/strong> for banned accounts” – can you clarify this or point me to the discussion please? Cheers.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n![\"Use](\"https:\/\/englishteststore.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/Use-the-word-criteria.jpg\" "\\"Use")
Example sentences of “criteria”:<\/h2>\n
- I think this only misses criteria<\/strong><\/strong> 6 of the GA criteria<\/strong><\/strong> in its current form.\r\n
- Note: It is probably less work to get a GA to meet VGA criteria<\/strong> than it is to get a regular article there; despite this, both ways are left open.\r\n
- Secondly, there will still many outstanding issues in the article - perhaps more than I suggested in my closing statement - and considering a criteria<\/strong> for both VGA and GA is that the article shouldn't undergo lots of changes recently it seemed appropriate to close instead of leaving it running or giving it a 'no-consensus' extension.\r\n
<\/pre>\nMore in-sentence examples of “criteria”:<\/h2>\n
- Additionally, the direct conversion fuel cells use has less risk of producing secondary emissions like NOx, SOx, and particulate matter, which are side effects of combustion, contribute to global warming, and are known as criteria<\/strong> pollutants.\r\n
- However, even the modified 2002 CDC criteria<\/strong> do not identify women with subclinical disease.\r\n
- I've gone through the article, linked and simplified where possible and checked the whole thing off against the criteria<\/strong> - I believe the article meets all of them already, it just needs some fresh eyes to ensure it's not too complex.\r\n
<\/pre>\n