<\/p>\n
+ Also, these include cases where the silencer was not used, but simply in the possession of the defendant<\/strong> for 92% of prosecutions involving a silencer.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Even if a state does not list a certain thing as a mitigating factor, a defendant<\/strong> can still bring up that factor in court.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + In these special cases, not having a lawyer would make it difficult for a defendant<\/strong> to get a fair trial.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + A defendant<\/strong> may also be called a respondent, if a petition is used against them to make them come to court.\n<\/p>\n + It orders the defendant<\/strong><\/strong> to pay money only if the defendant<\/strong><\/strong> was not careful enough.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + When a defendant<\/strong> causes an injury on purpose, that injury is an intentional tort.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + In 2012, his health was found to be good enough to be a defendant<\/strong> in a criminal trial, for the 2011 Norway attacks.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + If a defendant<\/strong> in a civil or criminal case wants to provide an alternative set of facts to those provided by the prosecution or the plaintiff, this is called an “affirmative defense”.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Case of \u201cSnipers\u201d was instituted against the defendant<\/strong> and dealt with his participation in the shooting of pro-European demonstrators in Vilnius and his cooperation with the KGB.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Another job of a forensic psychologist is to investigate the state of mind of the defendant<\/strong> at the time he or she committed the crime.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + It’s about 12 Juryjurors having to decide whether a defendant<\/strong> is guilty or not, with only one person saying not guilty in the beginning and trying to convince everyone to vote the same.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + In “Batson” the court ruled that the defendant<\/strong> could make a “prima facie” case for purposeful racial discrimination in jury selection by relying on the record only in his own case.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + In criminal procedurecriminal trials, the insanity defense is the claim that the defendant<\/strong> is not responsible for his or her actions due to a mental illness.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + The Double Jeopardy clause in the Fifth Amendment forbids a defendant<\/strong> from being tried again on the same charges in the same case following a legitimate acquittal or conviction.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + If the jury, or judge in a bench trial, has no doubt as to the defendant<\/strong><\/strong>‘s guilt, or if their only doubts are unreasonable doubts, then the prosecutor has proved the defendant<\/strong><\/strong> is guilty.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Many of the above are considered an affirmative defense in which case the burden of proof may be on the defendant<\/strong> to prove their innocence.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + In common law countries, a defendant<\/strong> may enter a peremptory plea of “autrefois acquit” or “autrefois convict”.Stephen Vincent Ben\u00e9t.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Usually, a defendant<\/strong> did not need a lawyer to get a fair trial, the Court said.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + A garnishment is the means for collecting monetary judgments against a defendant<\/strong> by ordering third parties to pay money directly toward the plaintiff.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + When that occurs, the defendant<\/strong> will usually be held in the county jail until he or she can be taken into the custody of the state’s prison system.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + In each case, the judge was supposed to talk to the defendant<\/strong> to figure out whether any of these “special circumstances” existed.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + While the public and the press have a First Amendment interest in open proceedings, under some circumstances a defendant<\/strong> waive his rights to a public trial.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + In a case of negligence, the court figures out what happened and decides whether the defendant<\/strong> was careful enough.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Admitting out of court statements, often called hearsay evidence, may also prevent a defendant<\/strong> from confronting his accusers.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + In this case, a defendant<\/strong> was convicted.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + In some kinds of cases, it does not matter whether the defendant<\/strong> was careful or not.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + The right to a jury has always depended on the nature of the offense with which the defendant<\/strong> is charged.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + The first is “malingering” a defendant<\/strong> is pretending to have a mental illness, or is lying to the court about his state of mind.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Bail is the amount of money, property or bond bond that a forfeited and the defendant<\/strong> may face additional penalties.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + The defendant<\/strong> to a cause of action must file an “Answer” to the complaint in which the “claims” can be admitted or denied.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + In most cases, a defendant<\/strong> being charged with a crime has the right to defend himself.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + For example, in the United States, if someone buys a soda can and it explodes because it was manufactured badly, the manufacturer will probably have to pay the victim money even if the court finds that the defendant<\/strong> was as careful as it could be.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + If the crime is serious, the defendant<\/strong> may go to prison or, in some countries, be executed.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + If a defendant<\/strong> can prove these things to an appeals court, they have proved that their lawyer was ineffective.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Clause 3 of Section 2 says that federal crimes have to be tried in front of a jury, unless the defendant<\/strong> does not want a jury.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + In many cases the statute of limitations is jurisdictional, so that a defendant<\/strong><\/strong> can get a dismissal of a charge even if the defense is not raised, but in some cases the defendant<\/strong><\/strong> risks waiving the statute of limitations defense if it is not raised before conviction.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + However, a court can rule that the defendant<\/strong> will not be able to give himself a good enough defense.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + It does not matter whether the defendant<\/strong> is paying the lawyer, or the lawyer was assigned for free.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + When a statute of limitations expires in a Criminal lawcriminal case, if the defendant<\/strong> or judge raises a statute of limitations defense, the person can no longer be placed on trial for that cause.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + These include the nature of the offense, how much evidence there is against the accused and what ties the defendant<\/strong> has to the community.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + If the delay in bringing a defendant<\/strong> to trial exceeds one year following the arrest, this will trigger a presumption that the Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial may have been violated.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + A defendant<\/strong> is the person or group of people who comes to court because of a complaint by a plaintiff.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Following a decade-long denial of the lawsuit at the Municipal Court in Kotor Varo\u0161 and the District Court in Banja Luka, the Constitutional Court of RS issued a verdict in their favor only in December 2019, obliging the defendant<\/strong> to reimburse all costs of the trial.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + If doubt “does” affect a “reasonable person’s” belief that the defendant<\/strong> is guilty, then the jury is not satisfied beyond “reasonable doubt”.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + A plaintiff can usually sue a defendant<\/strong><\/strong> only if that defendant<\/strong><\/strong> was the one who hurt the plaintiff.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Most trials ended with the defendant<\/strong> simply giving up his beliefs and being let go.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + For example, a defendant<\/strong> might be driving while drunk, and he might hit an electric pole.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, among other provisions, forbids states from denying anyone their life, their liberty or their property without due process of law Another example is when the prosecution fails to disclose information to the defense that would show the defendant<\/strong> is not guilty of the crime.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + It is an answer, made by a defendant<\/strong> to a plaintiff’s action or a denial of a prosecutor’s charges.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + This is particularly important for cases involving serious crimes and where it is impossible to find a jury who will not know the defendant<\/strong> in a small population island.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + The plaintiff tries to prove that he or she has a reason why the defendant<\/strong> needs to give him or her money.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Another job is to evaluate the defendant<\/strong> to see if he or she is able to be rehabilitated, or if they might commit the crime again.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Finally, a cross-claim is the same as a counter-claim or contribution claim, except that it is asserted by a defendant<\/strong><\/strong> against other defendant<\/strong><\/strong>s.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Both the accusers and the defendant<\/strong> had to make speeches in person to the jury.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + The other party is called the defendant<\/strong> because it must defend what it has done.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Sometimes, a jury is brought in to determine whether the defendant<\/strong> is guilty or not guilty.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + This can be either the plaintiff or the defendant<\/strong> who files the petition to the higher court for judicial review.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + The defendant<\/strong> appears before the judge when the warrant is requested.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + The story is about 12 juryjurors having to vote on whether the defendant<\/strong> being tried for the murder of his father.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + However, as long as the defendant<\/strong><\/strong> was not charged with a capital crime, the states did not have to assign free lawyers to every defendant<\/strong><\/strong> who could not afford them.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + For example, if a witness is unavailable and testified against the defendant<\/strong><\/strong> in previous judicial proceedings, and the defendant<\/strong><\/strong> was able to cross-examine the witness, a transcript of the testimony may be used as evidence.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + After a defendant<\/strong> is convicted of a crime, he or she may be sentenced to prison.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + It means the defendant<\/strong> has given up their right to have a lawyer.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + If a defendant<\/strong> does not assert the right to a speedy trial early enough, they may lose their claim.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + The defendant<\/strong> has decided to act as their own lawyer.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + Usually, the plaintiff in a lawsuit is asking the court to make the defendant<\/strong><\/strong> pay money to make up for the harm that the defendant<\/strong><\/strong> caused.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n + In “Swain”, the Court had recognized that a “State’s purposeful or deliberate denial to Negroes on account of race of participation as jurors in the administration of justice violates the Equal Protection Clause”, but that the defendant<\/strong> had the burden of proving a systematic striking of black jurors throughout the county, that is, that the peremptory challenge system as a whole was being perverted.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n![\"defendant](\"https:\/\/englishteststore.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/defendant-some-example-sentences.jpg\" "\\"defendant")
Example sentences of “defendant”:<\/h2>\n
+ It orders the defendant<\/strong><\/strong> to pay money only if the defendant<\/strong><\/strong> was not careful enough.\r\n
+ When a defendant<\/strong> causes an injury on purpose, that injury is an intentional tort.\r\n
<\/pre>\nMore in-sentence examples of “defendant”:<\/h2>\n
+ In this case, a defendant<\/strong> was convicted.\r\n
+ In some kinds of cases, it does not matter whether the defendant<\/strong> was careful or not.\r\n
+ The right to a jury has always depended on the nature of the offense with which the defendant<\/strong> is charged.\r\n
<\/pre>\n