<\/p>\n
– One night this week I believe we tagged around 8 or 9 articles for QD in one night, yet none of them were deleted<\/strong> until the next morning.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Has also been recreated several times with the same content which has been deleted<\/strong> before.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Speedy Deleted<\/strong> as hoaxes.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – The article was deleted<\/strong> on pt.wiki several times.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – When deleting one of the redirects they made, I noticed that it was also deleted<\/strong> in 2013 in a mass deletion of pages by 80.44.247.122.\n<\/p>\n – Votes to “keep” the article were deleted<\/strong> as well.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – If you only “think” that content on a particular page is a copyright infringement, then you may remove the text and ask for it to be deleted<\/strong> from the history at the.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Update: That page on enwiki was deleted<\/strong> yesterday.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – If its deleted<\/strong> then why not notified to me.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I have noticed that many new pages made by these users had to be deleted<\/strong> as they have little or no useful content.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Because it is currently not wanted, it should be deleted<\/strong> unless someone else wants to restart the project in the future.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – If you believe something was deleted<\/strong> unnecessarily, you can for assistance.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I got this taking the number of edits that it shows in my settings and subtracting around 2,900 edits or so from that to account for deleted<\/strong> edits.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – The only way I can see of reducing these is maybe blocking users who repeatedly copy-paste articles, because if this continues, we run the risk of having the entire wiki deleted<\/strong> for basically being a copy of EN.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – The initial editor recommended that the article be deleted<\/strong><\/strong> as there were concerns regarding the subject’s notability which were addressed during the “discussion” period; however, the article was still deleted<\/strong><\/strong>.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – One thing to note is that even if an article is deleted<\/strong><\/strong> the attribution is kept, which is why we keep deleted<\/strong><\/strong> articles.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – It’s now been created and deleted<\/strong> five times in less than three months, each time by a different IP.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Page was previously quick deleted<\/strong> as vandalism\/not notable but has been remade and as such is no longer QD candidate but requires RfD now to delete it.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I also note, for what it’s worth, that the same article was deleted<\/strong> on enwiki.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – If there is a page that needs to be deleted<\/strong> because it is a copyright violation, then tag it with.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – The page “CoNetrix” was deleted<\/strong> by Orangemike on August 19, 2009 for Advertising.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I know that there were prior deleted<\/strong> versions of Sam Chelladurai before the current one, but I do not have access to them.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – The subject English Article was deleted<\/strong> asked to delete with a Notable reason and it was used against my Thai Project yesterday that is why I am here.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – The article was deleted<\/strong> multiple times on Enwiki.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – To make room for the previously uncached entry, another cached entry may need to be deleted<\/strong> from the cache.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – The articles they were trying to get accepted there, all got deleted<\/strong> post-haste as non notable.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – This error usually occurs because someone deleted<\/strong> another ref with that same name that had text in it.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Eerie Eagle edited page Jason Smith which had been repeatedly deleted<\/strong> under this name or other name.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Anyway, editors wanting to have them deleted<\/strong> will have to wait a moment until we have a consensus.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Also, only 30 minuites were given between me being told and the page being deleted<\/strong> which I think is not enough time for me to respond.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Was deleted<\/strong> twice on enwiki.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – What does concern me is some recently deleted<\/strong> articles Razor tagged for QD.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Up till now, admins have simply deleted<\/strong> such edits, but that is not the proper way of dealing with them.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Thousands of dinosaur images were deleted<\/strong> from Commons, and then from dozens of wikis by CommonsDelinker.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Now seeing as it’s still serving as a deleted<\/strong> category, I say we recreate or restore it till at least the discussion on simple talk concludes.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – AN ANONYMOUS USER DELETED<\/strong> IT ONCE BEFORE BECAUSE THE ORIGINAL LINK REQUIRED A SUBSCRIPTION TO VIEW THE ENTIRE ARTICLE.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – The page Daxx has been quickly deleted<\/strong> and I didn’t have time to react.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Unexplained and uncategorized templates may be deleted<\/strong> by any editor.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – This should already be deleted<\/strong> because ten days have gone by and everybody says delete.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – If not, it will probably be deleted<\/strong> again.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – It was deleted<\/strong> as it was unapproved last time.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Isn’t deleted<\/strong><\/strong> edits just articles I made that have been deleted<\/strong><\/strong>.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I only QD’d it under G4 because on the tag, it just says ‘recreation of deleted<\/strong> material’, and when the admin deletes it, it says the same thing.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I am nominating the redirect page to be deleted<\/strong> because it is a misspelling.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – So, I think it is best we deleted<\/strong> this.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Note: The article has been deleted<\/strong> many times at en.wiki as well.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I saw the non-initial article name had been deleted<\/strong> under G4 previously, so used it here, apologies for the out of process.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – It just happened that the article was deleted<\/strong> 3 times at EN.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Most of these could be deleted<\/strong> under QDA2.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Record of everything that was deleted<\/strong> as a result of the initial upgrade to MediaWiki software.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – If this ends up getting deleted<\/strong><\/strong>, his company I’m Shmacked should get deleted<\/strong><\/strong> as well.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – This page I created was deleted<\/strong> by a non-administrator, It was about a well-known rapper in Florida.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I’ve deleted<\/strong> several because they weren’t simplified enough from enwiki.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – He deleted<\/strong> all of my pages and with false accusations as well.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Also deleted<\/strong> from Enwiki for the same reasons.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Some people have said that reviewing blocks should be no different than reviewing deleted<\/strong> pages: users ask the deleting admin to overturn their decision to delete the page.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – This article should be deleted<\/strong> and redirected to Transsexual.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I was recently going to create an article for a famous artist, however upon beginning creation I saw that the article had been created several times and deleted<\/strong> due to “lack of notability”.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I know that my is relatively low compared to other new admins, but one should note that many of my edits have been speedy deleted<\/strong> after I have posted speedy tags on articles.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – See the following, for example, which were deleted<\/strong> using this criterion and restored or objected to yesterday on the argument that it doesn’t apply to them.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – They were deleted<\/strong> on enwiki back in 2007, and there’s no foreseeable use for them here.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Repetitive deletion of articles on the sole basis that the article was previously deleted<\/strong> does not apply to articles which were originally QDeleted<\/strong>.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – G13 Pages that are complete and utter spam can be quickly deleted<\/strong> under this rule.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – From a sampling of roughly 1600: 30% were eventually connected to other-language versions; 5% were translated; 16% were deleted<\/strong> or redirected ; 18% were marked as candidates for translation.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I didn’t think any pages would be edited or deleted<\/strong> by moderators in such a short amount of time, so I didn’t bother instructing them about what to do if someone deletes their article.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n![\"deleted](\"https:\/\/englishteststore.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/deleted-in-sentences.jpg\" "\\"deleted")
Example sentences of “deleted”:<\/h2>\n
- Votes to \"keep\" the article were deleted<\/strong> as well.\r\n
- If you only \"think\" that content on a particular page is a copyright infringement, then you may remove the text and ask for it to be deleted<\/strong> from the history at the.\r\n
<\/pre>\nMore in-sentence examples of “deleted”:<\/h2>\n