<\/p>\n
– It is better to say “this gives some idea, but for an exact wording<\/strong> see…”.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I would really like a few people to come and comment on the final wording<\/strong> to make sure there is no opposition or word tweaking, though.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Please do not use this template on the talk pages of evidently good-faith constructive IP users, since its wording<\/strong> could be misunderstood as implying the IP’s edits are problematic.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Create sub-headings if a section becomes too long, and choose a wording<\/strong> that describes what is discussed in the section.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I have proposed some changes to the wording<\/strong> of two QD criteria.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – It is not a community ban of 6 months as Chenzw’s wording<\/strong> suggests.\n<\/p>\n – Support removal – if anything it should be an “opt-in” gadget as opposed to opt-out, as it’s not simple in the current wording<\/strong> and, furthermore, as we’ve said many times before AN isn’t really the place to be directing new users to, which is ultimately the aim of the sidebar.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – A more appropriate wording<\/strong> would be ‘Very Good Pages’, ‘VGP’ for short…\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – This exact wording<\/strong> is not needed as long as the same information is given.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – However, there is no way currently to change the wording<\/strong> presented.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – For templates where the number of pages is more than 100,000 or if the first parameter is set to “risk”, a stronger wording<\/strong> is given.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Please read it, correct the typos I might have missed, and change the wording<\/strong> to make it easier to understand.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Even if it’s not a slam-dunk that would block a newbie, or light contributor, is this the kind of response we want to model to others from powerful members here? Shouldn’t they know better a whole lot better? I am trying to piece together a scenario in my mind, where one of the admins I know on en-wiki, through some unfortunate wording<\/strong> or misunderstanding might have left me wondering about their intentions in a case similar this, prompting me to query them on their en-wiki talk page in a similar fashion.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I would first and formost like to apologize to Giggy for my reaction to his oppose vote, but to tell you the truth, the wording<\/strong> of his oppose vote was what made me a bit irritated in the first place, which was why the big firefight erupted when his oppose vote came into the fray.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – As no exact count was ascertained, the report includes a wording<\/strong> of “hundreds of victims” referring to the territory relevant for Italo-Slovenian relations, and thus excluding the Croatian territories.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – This makes it the new law and the wording<\/strong> of the Constitution is changed.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – The wording<\/strong> I suggested was just one possibility, and I certainly wouldn’t have to use AWB to make any changes.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – With the exclusion of Portugal and Croatia, the other nine countries that opposed Romania believed that Romania’s wording<\/strong> did not cover enough information regarding protecting the EU’s citizens’ copyright protections.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Because of the hugely wonderful, over-the-top positive wording<\/strong><\/strong>, those spins have a second benefit of laughing away the insults, which were not just undone, but thoroughly trounced, beaten down 100 times, by the overly-positive wording<\/strong><\/strong> of the enthusiastic spin.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – However, on some pages, such as Pi, I see that the original wording<\/strong> is used.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Replace with wording<\/strong> for the template to display, thus:.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – The inclusion of false and inflamatory wording<\/strong> debased TFP and the community it represents.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Also I noticed that the wording<\/strong> at CAT:TEMP contradicts itself.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I forget the exact legal wording<\/strong> off the top of my head but basically anything that is done in a manor that many people could be expected to lay that data out if they all did it without knowledge of anyone else doing it is not copyrightable.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – It is generally bad etiquette to modify somebody else’s wording<\/strong> But it can be acceptable to…\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Every section-specific GeoGroup box is worded “Map this section’s coordinates…”, and currently there is no way to change the wording<\/strong> presented.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – There is currently no option to change the wording<\/strong> that is shown in the GeoGroup box displayed in an article.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Changes to the wording<\/strong> is still possible until the 25; From the 26 it will be possible to vote on the set of criteria we have, for one week.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Romania will have an opportunity to improve their wording<\/strong> for Article 11 and 13 to gain a majority vote, but this has caused the final vote for the directive from May 2019.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – That article and the wording<\/strong> in it was plagiarized by numerous physicians including neurologists in the U.S.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – The wording<\/strong> of the Eighth Amendment is almost the same as three of the provisions in the EnglandEnglish Bill of Rights of 1689.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Romania cancelled these meetings because Romania’s proposal for the directive used wrong wording<\/strong> to describe how the directive will be run.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Apparently Djsasso thinks his wording<\/strong> of “push a candidate they like to passing” equates to simply adding a “support” vote.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Representative Livermore pointed out on the floor of the House of Representatives that the wording<\/strong> was vague.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – They improve the wording<\/strong> of the licenses and make them usable in other countries.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – The wording<\/strong> of the referendum question was a subject of debate between members of the Parti Qu\u00e9b\u00e9cois caucus.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Along the same lines, I would like to see a standard wording<\/strong> used when talking about TV and movie reviews.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Certain vandalism templates should be updated; there needs to be better wording<\/strong> in these templates.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – The navigation bar does not show the usual, simple wording<\/strong><\/strong>, but wording<\/strong><\/strong> similar to en..\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Which wording<\/strong> is better? Please delete one of the cats so that the subcats can all be on the cat that is kept.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I also want to move Template:Unsimple to Template:Complex and change the wording<\/strong> of it and anything else that may have the bad words on it.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Changed wording<\/strong> such as “After the retirement of Utah Senator Orrin Hatch” to “After Utah Senator Orrin Hatch retired” and “Romney defeated Jenny Wilson in the general election in November 2018.” to “Romney defeated Democratic candidate Jenny Wilson in the general election in November 2018.”.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – There were 11 countries currently in the EU that did not like Romania’s wording<\/strong> to describe Article 11 and 13: Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, Finland, Slovenia, Italy, Poland, Sweden, Croatia, Luxembourg, and Portugal.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – A tornado emergency is a stronger wording<\/strong> of tornado warnings used by the National Weather Service in the United States.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I am going to bed : but we will want to adjust the wording<\/strong> on templates so they are simpler.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – They included the words: “a well regulated Militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defence of a free State.” Other states followed with similar wording<\/strong> in their own constitutions.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Each veiled insult, or slur, against your wiki-reputation can be given an easy spin, with follow-on wording<\/strong> that focuses on a strongly positive view about each comment.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – I had mentioned to them that they shouldn’t do that and they pointed out that the current wording<\/strong> of does allow for it.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – The wording<\/strong> “State of Louisiana” is on the outer edge of the seal.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – The AfD on enwiki had multiple socks !voting in it, and they were CU confirmed, where the socks also used the wording<\/strong> “should not be delete” in their keep reasons.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – No matter if the template is set to display coordinates of a faraway section, the GeoGroup box’s wording<\/strong> will still assert it will display coordinates of “this section”.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Within an article page, the particular wording<\/strong> of a section header can overly limit the allowable text of the section.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – When it is possible, be specific to avoid wording<\/strong> that is not clear.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Based on the wording<\/strong> that Creol used after I brought this up, I could tell it was not KA.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Some preferred a simple wording<\/strong> focused on Quebec becoming sovereign from Canada.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Even if a change violates the exact wording<\/strong> of a rule, it might still be a good change.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – The RCMP\/”GRC” wording<\/strong> is protected under the Canadian Trade-marks Act.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – The first argument is invalid because wording<\/strong> was almost the same as the Fifteenth Amendment.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – We should replace it with a two-line wording<\/strong> which is friendlier to the eye.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Rather than having to re-read, each time, the negative wording<\/strong> of the insult, the text to be seen, each time, is the glowing positive view of the improvements that you have made.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Much tangent-level wording<\/strong> should be moved to lower sections.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n – Also when “section=” option is used, there is no way to change displayed wording<\/strong> from “Map this section’s coordinates using…”.\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n![\"wording](\"https:\/\/englishteststore.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/wording-example-sentences.jpg\" "\\"wording")
Example sentences of “wording”:<\/h2>\n
- Support removal - if anything it should be an \"opt-in\" gadget as opposed to opt-out, as it's not simple in the current wording<\/strong> and, furthermore, as we've said many times before AN isn't really the place to be directing new users to, which is ultimately the aim of the sidebar.\r\n
- A more appropriate wording<\/strong> would be 'Very Good Pages', 'VGP' for short...\r\n
<\/pre>\nMore in-sentence examples of “wording”:<\/h2>\n