How to use in-sentence of “notability”:
+ If the notability is not proven with these sources, then notability is not established.
+ Based on the quality of current sources and passing mentions, the subject’s notability seems questionable.
+ Articles which fail to meet some notability standard, will likely be removed.
+ Basically a simplified version of the film notability guidelines DJ cites above.
+ I personally do not see encyvlopedic notability and propose deleting the article.
+ Surely the main issue is notability but might help to make things more clear.
+ With regards to notability of the subject, the subject has been covered in top media agencies like India Today, Times of India, NewsX, Associated Press and has author links to India’s largest publication Juggernaut Books.
Example sentences of “notability”:
+ References used to support notability must meet additional criteria beyond reliability.
+ For those who would like more indepth ideas about notability in certain professions we can refer to English.
+ References used to support notability must meet additional criteria beyond reliability.
+ For those who would like more indepth ideas about notability in certain professions we can refer to English.
+ More fake than truth, no sources, notability questionable.
+ I am not sure about the notability of this page.
+ Couldn’t find any independent sources to support the notability of this person.
+ This would suggest a claim to notability for this article in question.
+ If the article can claim/show notability within the week, we can keep it.
+ I think it should be our benchmark for notability there.
+ Furthermore, this article does not meet the notability guidelines, either.
+ There are no sources to claim notability in the article and the text is a collection of some lists.
+ The same thing could apply to English villages: we have a number of those pages which do not address notability at all.
+ Research should include attempts to find sources which might show notability, and/or information which would show notability in another manner.
+ No assertion of notability as far as I can tell, and not really suited to this project at the moment.
+ The notability of the group is questionable.
+ This article has notability issues.
+ It is definitely not failing on general guidelines of notability related to companies.
More in-sentence examples of “notability”:
+ Evidence of notability could not be established.
+ I do however fail to see the encyclopedic notability of the lady: Yes, graduaded/PhD with honors.
+ I can't see anything that makes him notable, or meets our notability guidelines.
+ Evidence of notability could not be established.
+ I do however fail to see the encyclopedic notability of the lady: Yes, graduaded/PhD with honors.
+ I can’t see anything that makes him notable, or meets our notability guidelines.
+ Problem though: The series is not in English, so I don’t know if we are the right wiki? – Btw: Searching for the name of the series in Google turns up SEWP as first hit, so there are probably notability issues as well…
+ But prior of doing so, as an editor who follows AGF, I would better try to assess the potential notability of the article/topic, because I wouldn’t like to waste time of fellow editors.
+ What do you consider to show notability? Guidelines exist because notability is subjective to each individual.
+ A few months ago, I cleaned the article’s tone, but now I believe this simply fails the general notability criteria.
+ When doing a google search with that exact name, the very first hit is SEWP, which usually points to a notability problem.
+ I would suggest that this person does not meet our notability guidelines.
+ The claims for notability are pretty weak.
+ Barras: Saying “”x is a city in y” does not show how the subject is notable.” is implying, at least to me, that we have a notability guideline for towns/cities/metropolitan areas/hamlets/villages/boroughs/municipalities/communes.
+ Do we want looser notability criteria for movies than enwiki? For example, if a movie has one or more major movie stars in it, is that enough? Please let me know your thoughts.
+ The education notability is further questioned by the fact that the subject is in a Secondary school, rather than a University which further questions the integrity and notability of the CfAT.
+ The current sources do not establish notability because of their inherent unreliability as commercial sites.
+ While the “XY is a tehsil in AB district” articles are comparable to the “X is a city in Y, US”, the notability of the tehsils is much harder to verify.
+ And is the general rule-of-thumb for leaving a red link to a nonexistent page based on its potential notability for Simple WP in particular? “N.B.
+ Having editorials and columns written about him in the Chicago Tribune are sufficient to establish notability it seems.
+ Only mayors of major cities, or those who achieve notability for things they do beyond their government work, are notable and worthy of an article.
+ Personally, I think a vote would be wrong, in the sense that you do not need to vote on the notability of a geographic location.
+ Providing no arguments to the template will link to the generic notability guidelines.
+ The subject might be notable, however, so this nomination will provide time for the original author or other interested parties to improve the article to meet our notability standards.
+ The article is solely using a lot of sources to pander notability but non goes beyond routine coverage.
+ No notability was shown at all.
+ Either way, both lack notability and coverage in reliable sources.
+ While I can see the reason for deletion, the first line of a Simple article is likely to be the same as the first line of the EN equivalent – especially in such topics – and notability is obvious.
+ In most cases, nationality and notability will combine in a single category.
+ If if were not for the weak statement of importance in the infobox this article would qualify for quick deletion on the notability criteria.
+ Problem though: Given that the publicatiions listed are not in English, assessing notability is difficult.
+ No sources to prove notablity at all and the only English source is IMDB which doesn’t prove notability as well as it isn’t considered reliable.
+ I see no indication of his notability as a publisher.
+ The article still must show a movie’s notability through reliable sources.
+ There’s certainly nothing here to show notability beyond the mere fact that it’s from the Rolling Stones.
+ An assertion of notability made, so speedy deletion is out of the question.
+ Your notability “guidelines” are silly, and have no place in a real encyclopædia.
+ I believe that the page is filled with falsehoods as well, hence it doesn’t meet the notability guidelines, so I believe it should be deleted.
+ Personally, I don’t much see the point of many of them, but the inherent notability argument seems to win.
+ I looked into the articles on other wikis and there too the notability is questionable, so I think listing this article here for discussion would give the community the appropriate time to see if the person has sufficient coverage in sources in non-English languages or not.
+ No claim to notability and no coverage in sources anyway.
+ They are only notable for one event and thus fail notability requirements.
+ We have the general notability guideline…
+ The articles will get expanded eventually, and I definitely think that they had enough information at the time to guarantee the notability of them.
+ When the first two links on a Google search are the subject’s personal “.blogspot.com” page and LinkedIn profile, then you can pretty much assume they fail the notability requirements.
+ All articles on albums, singles or songs must meet the basic criteria at the notability guidelines, with important coverage in of the subject.
+ But I don’t find it crossing our notability guidelines for events and so I want to know what community thinks about this topic.
+ The articles don’t show notability of the individual characters.
+ Person in question is a local celebrity with little to no notability outside of a limited area.