How to use in-sentence of “deleting”:
+ The justification for deleting the article, stands as “07:31, 23 August 2017…
+ What is the community’s opinion of deleting pages like Carnegie Mellon University, Occupy and Puzzle quest, which have a little info, but, as I’ve written in deletion logs, “is better to start from scratch.” I have tried cleaning pages like this, adding categories, the infobox, interwikis, and re-writing, but it would be easier to just delete the page and let the article be created properly.
+ To get the right link in the edit summary, we need to manually enter the close reason when deleting these.
+ It would be productive then to carry through by deleting them on sight to prove that you’re being serious.
+ Any RfD that is initiated in 2017 but closed as a deletion in 2018 will require special handling when deleting the page.
+ For doing this, Hypervisor needs to monitor the paging activities of guest OS and intercept it with necessarily inserting, deleting or modifying entries in this second page table.
+ There will be significant collateral damage to deleting all WP: pages.
Example sentences of “deleting”:
+ I would support deleting most or all of them, as well as some of the categories they’re in.
+ Also note that this is about keeping or deleting the article, the actions of admins that acted on this article are out of the scope of this vote.
+ Note: this is about keeping or deleting the article based on our criteria; who created or edited the article is irrelevant.
+ And as for deleting truly small articles, we have QDA1.
+ I wish to use my admin tools to help out by blocking vandals and deleting pages that are not needed.
+ I think, that deleting all content a banned user like Pickmanbothlol creates would help keep users like him away.
+ Before deleting a page that meets one of the quick deletion criteria, administrators must always check the page’s edit history to see if the page can be reverted to an earlier version.
+ Today’s activites and personal attacks, deleting against other admin’s endorsed resotation of Autofellatio is clear evidence of an inability to continue as an admin.
+ I would support deleting most or all of them, as well as some of the categories they're in.
+ Also note that this is about keeping or deleting the article, the actions of admins that acted on this article are out of the scope of this vote.
+ Not that I’m taking sides, but under the logic I’ve seen, which is “If it’s worth speedy deleting then it’s sure to fall under a different QD rationale”, we should get rid of all but G2, G3 and G6.
+ I think that deleting the articles just because of how short they are is counter-productive towards our goal here of creating a comprehensive encyclopedia in Simple English.
+ Since I know how difficult it is to create articles from a mobile device, and I think the article could possibly be kept, I want to go through a regular RfD process, rather than deleting it as “test page”.
+ There is far too much emphasis on deleting – let us simply expand.
+ What do you think deleting 20,000 stubs will do? Clog up the deletion log.
+ I did not give it the multiple passes that I give my own articles, but I thought that it was a better solution than quick deleting the article.
More in-sentence examples of “deleting”:
+ Administrators can help, by deleting user pages and doing selective restorations, to clear the edit history of respective pages.
+ Moving a character to another position in the text, swapping two characters, as well as adding, deleting or replacing longer blocks of characters are not counted as single changes in this measure.
+ With no challenge on notability, why was there no Template:Complex or other indication that the page needed further expansion and editing "before deleting it" - that way I'd have been alerted to return to it, prioritizing this before my ongoing editing in small WPs and Wikidata, etc.
+ Administrators can help, by deleting user pages and doing selective restorations, to clear the edit history of respective pages.
+ Moving a character to another position in the text, swapping two characters, as well as adding, deleting or replacing longer blocks of characters are not counted as single changes in this measure.
+ With no challenge on notability, why was there no Template:Complex or other indication that the page needed further expansion and editing “before deleting it” – that way I’d have been alerted to return to it, prioritizing this before my ongoing editing in small WPs and Wikidata, etc.
+ I see at least one admin deleting on these grounds due to lack of attribution, and another admin declining such QDs.
+ Consequently, on March 22, 1956, amendment was made, deleting May 9 and inserting February 9 in the Act as Armed Forces Day.
+ Therefore, I propose deleting :Template:Interlanguage link, its redirects, and this category.
+ I told him that as he clearly didn’t want to help resolve this issue as quickly as possible, I would ask another administrator to look at the deleted articles and tell me whether Blockinblox was right in speedy deleting them.
+ While I hate the idea of deleting stubs, I don’t think I realized the numbers of each of those types were that big…that was rediculous to create that many and at numbers that high it quite clearly had to be editcoutitis.
+ However, once the article has been created the focus should be to merge it into a bigger one, or to extend it, rather than deleting it.
+ Computer users at home and in workplaces waste a lot of time opening and deleting spam messages.
+ Reading all above again, to me it seems that everyone has a more or less agreement with letting the article stay there for four days, and speedy deleting it if it is not simplified and changed within this time period, in a way that it could no more be named a derivative work of the En WP counterpart.
+ Is the “personal life” section really needed? I’m planning on deleting that entire section.
+ The deleting admin has a history of doing so and this is, in all honesty, pretty discouraging.
+ Kennedy first became active 7 months ago, and has displayed great article writing skills and has shown very good judgement in deleting QD pages since October 2008, when he was made an admin.
+ Yesterday I finished deleting the categories for.
+ I think we should consider deleting the article, if it cannot be extended to cover more.
+ Why are we deleting articles mere seconds after they are created…
+ If any of you are holding off on closing them because they are going to be more work than usual to process, then I would be glad to do the deleting and cleanup.
+ For these reasons, I propose deleting this article.
+ Administrators can also hide revisions of a page from public view by deleting them.
+ When deleting one of the redirects they made, I noticed that it was also deleted in 2013 in a mass deletion of pages by 80.44.247.122.
+ Non-physical accidents are things like accidentally telling someone a secret, forgetting something important, or deleting an important computer file.
+ And no, I won’t accept “Created by a user who has been globally locked” as a reson for deleting this article.
+ This template was for when there was no cascading protection and pages had to be salted by deleting then protecting page, now that there is cascading protection there is no use for this template.
+ Aem Fatson, I understand your initial suspicions of vandalism and reasons for blocking my students accounts and deleting their articles.
+ In short: we are probably better off deleting this page.
+ But I do have a problem with deleting stubs on notable topics.
+ I recommend blocking both accounts and deleting any pages they created.
+ If you do this, please add the information to the new page before deleting it from the old and it is polite to mention the move in your change summary note.
+ Toyota Prius which I’ll be deleting shortly if it does not become attributed.
+ The wiki user “TheRedPenOfDoom” insists on deleting the wiki entries that others have added because it is HIS opinion that the wiki page provides no new material.
+ Suggest deleting article as the subject is “not notable”.
+ Then we have to go through the whol process of marking the word as then transwiki’ing that, and then marking it for quick deletion, and then deleting it! I think a lot time would be saved if we would change at least some of the links like.
+ Sysops should also be aware of the general advice given on Help:Deleting a page In particular, note that there are many situations where a deleting is too drastic.
+ I’ve been deleting them as test pages because they’re clearly not viable articles.
+ Propose deleting this category, upmerging the “by country” category and moving the continents into an upmerged “by continent” subcategory.
+ Twinkle already has a built in warning for “removal of content or templates”, but that is more for deleting an entire article randomly.
+ As he likely is nono-notable, I propose deleting the article.
+ Care should be taken when deleting references to avoid creating a cite error.
+ He has been deleting it for utterly spurious reasons.
+ In my opinion keeping them in their current shape is wrong but deleting is even more wrong.
+ I am opposed to deleting the pages, but I still support redirecting the definitions, and allowing them to be broken off into independent articles whenever someone has something of substance to add.
+ Once connected and authenticated from the server, and renaming, deleting files on the server, changing file permissions, etc.
+ So if and when you guys get of deleting it…
+ Remember that changing an article to a redirect is better than deleting it if the article’s title is helpful for finding information.
+ I assume good faith here but the deleting admin’s pattern and history of doing the same over and over again suggest otherwise.