How to use in-sentence of “sysop”:
+ The sysop tools would help me to even better contribute to this project, hence I accept.
+ This will aid in clean-up, I know is currently a sysop level access, so there might be some arguments that why not flag down any sysop or GR, but I think if we can trust them with rollback, we can with this and if anyone misuse, it can be easily removed and the redirect can be reinstated without much trouble.
+ Often beating me to revert, tagging etc, he’s done a lot of good work here since January, and I think SysOp tools will help his work here further.
+ From a technical point of view, it is better to say that bureaucrat’s cannot delete/protect/block, and they only can promote other users to sysop or bureaucrat level, and can rename user accounts, and grant falgs to bot accounts.
+ I’d like to thank Fr33kman for the nomination and for believing in me and that I am able to re-gain the sysop flag.
+ I’ve been a sysop for a few months now.
+ I’ve checked his other user accounts on other wikis, but he only has sysop rights in here.
+ I would like to nominate myself for a CheckUser, I’m also a sysop and a bureaucrat here but I think that I could help more with CU flag.
Example sentences of “sysop”:
+ So he obviously knows what is needed for Sysop privileges.
+ That said, I repeat I’m okay with removing sysop perms from an admin account which hasn’t been used for a long time.
+ Would any roaming sysop please import a fresh copy of Template:Infobox person when able? I want to start working on fixing the deprecated errors and have learned it’s best to start with a fresh import.
+ I suggest extending the creation protection of Ali Sarhan shamran and similar articles to sysop for a period of time, as the new socks simply edit their userpage and wait to be confirmed.
+ Please remove my sysop tools to prevent any future nefarious actions on this account.
+ But I would like to be considered to be granted the Sysop tools in the “future”.
+ Being a sysop is not a “power” or a “position”, but it is not merely a “different level of access” as well.
+ After the debacle of the Razorflame RfA, sorry Razor, I made it my bussiness to learn all the rules in case I ever wanted to apply for sysop privileges, so I think I know the rules well enough.
+ So he obviously knows what is needed for Sysop privileges.
+ That said, I repeat I'm okay with removing sysop perms from an admin account which hasn't been used for a long time.
+ The specific tabs displayed on your pages depend on whether or not you are logged into the wiki and whether you have sysop privileges on the wiki.
+ This is why it is important to leave a blocked user able to edit their talk page, or able to email a sysop just in case a mistake was made.
+ I was wondering if I could propose some edits to the abuse filter in a Google Doc or something and an admin could add them to the filter? I am familiar with the text you must use as I am sysop on another wiki that uses abuse filter.
+ If a user page was deleted because an editor left, it may be restored by a sysop if the editor comes back, particularly if the history contains evidence of policy violations.
+ Here’s why he should be granted the Sysop flag, he has at least 50, most of which are QD tags.
+ But I think that he is still worthy to keep his sysop tools and still edits occassionally.
More in-sentence examples of “sysop”:
+ If a sysop disagrees about restoring, please at least paste-copy the last version in my own page to give me a last chance to improve it.
+ Of course, if they do, we can always give them the bit back, but for now, I don’t see the need for users who have retired to keep their sysop bit.
+ I am a trusted user on simpleWP and am both a sysop and a bureaucrat here.
+ Any meta sysop can edit the Wikimedia-wide spam blacklist to add or remove the words that are recognized by the filter, with the changes taking effect immediately.
+ Weak Oppose Do we need to get every editor from EN WP over here and give them sysop tools? Cometstyles? Come on.
+ The extra powers of a sysop user are intended for use in settling disputes and preventing repeated vandalism.
+ While I believe that he won’t abuse any of his sysop tools if he gets them, and could further improve this wiki.
+ Editors who only revert vandalism don’t need the sysop tools, because they are already doing a good job.
+ I think that Griffin is a net positive as an editor and his promotion to sysop would bring some much needed flavor into the ranks.
+ I suggest an independent, uninvolved sysop determine if consensus is obtained in 7 days.
+ I don’t think he would ever abuse his sysop tools and could further help contributing in this wiki with extra tools.
+ I’m an admin of this wiki from 5 month and I never abuse of sysop tools.
+ I have not used Simple for very long but I would like sysop rights to help delete the many pages that I see go for a significant amount of time without being deleted.
+ As a sysop you must make this choice, and wield your power responsibly.
+ I also think that if he is granted sysop tools, he could monitor vandalism while the other admins are offline.
+ I am inviting the community to grant the sysop flag to BG7.
+ I have decided to co-nominate to be granted the Sysop flag.
+ Do you guys feel you have adequate sysop manpower these days? I’ve been less active around here than I used to be, but I’m also a pretty experienced sysop now.
+ I’m an active user and sysop on :nl: and I’ll work on adding interwiki’s on :nds-nl:.
+ I think I will be a great sysop because I have a lot of free time to be here, will be tough on vandalism, and am not tolerant of people being rude.
+ With us now being about half way through 2009, i’ve also had a look back at the predictions that I made in our, the flood flag has been enabled, and GBots 3 and 4 have both been brought online – albeit with some problems, and not as was originally intended! There have also been no less than 16 Sysop promotions – of which one was mine and one was a re-promotion, 3 Bureaucrat promotions, and 2 CheckUser promotions.
+ Deleting a page is a straightforward operation for anyone with sysop permissions.
+ I’ll probably end myself this vote for the third time at midnight because not a single sysop will dare oppose story.
+ Only a user with sysop permissions can edit a protected page.
+ If it is, please tell a sysop on the m:main pagemeta-wiki; they can put in a Wikimedia-wide text filter.
+ If a sysop disagrees about restoring, please at least paste-copy the last version in my own page to give me a last chance to improve it.
+ Of course, if they do, we can always give them the bit back, but for now, I don't see the need for users who have retired to keep their sysop bit.
+ I haven’t reported a vandal to VIP ever since getting the sysop tools; I block on sight after they vandalize after their fourth warning.
+ I am a rollbacker on and a sysop on.
+ The reason I’m happy to stand and nominate IWI is I believe they’ve genuinely demonstrated a willingness to learn, dedication to the project, and the competence necessary to be a great sysop here.
+ At the same time, he was recently promoted to sysop over at the simple english wikitionary.
+ The last time I ran to be a sysop I learned a lot about policies and guidlines and since then I have spent a lot of time trying to learn them.
+ Nomination by Razorflame: Today, I would like to present Djsasso to the community for the sysop flag.
+ I propose to enable the ability for our local crats to be able to remove the sysop flag.
+ We should give everybody sysop tools if Cometstyles gets this.
+ A sysop will then delete it after checking that the page does not have evidence of policy violations that may need to be kept.
+ If there has been no disruptive behavior meriting the retention of that personal information, then the sysop can delete the page straight away in order to eliminate general public distribution of the history containing the information.
+ I think we should remove their sysop rights, but reinstate them when they return and feel like editing full-time again.
+ Why keep the sysop flag from me if you really believe that I could use the tools to their fullest potential? I do not believe that I am still leaping into situations without thinking anymore.
+ Could it possibly be either changed to “Edit: Autoconfirmed Move: Sysop” or “Edit: Sysop Move: Sysop ” so that I can edit.
+ Comppro request as one of his/her first edits sysop rights on simple and tried it on en, too.
+ Stewards can give sysop right on projects where there are no local bureaucrate.
+ J Di has said that she would rather lose the right to be a sysop rather than stay active.
+ Likewise only sysop users can protect a page in the first place, or unprotect the page to lift the restriction.
+ I think he’s ready now to be a sysop again.
+ As a result, I am making the decision to remove sysop rights in addition to bureaucrat rights.
+ Remember that only sysop users can undo a delete action, so to a normal user the information appears to be lost forever.
+ Additionally, sysop or not, we are all editors.
+ Given that and the above, I am considering BG please reconsider his actions, he is a sysop on this project and the actions should reflect that.
+ I think it’s clear that he should remain on the inactive list unless he asks for his sysop rights to be removed on meta or he becomes active again.