How to use in-sentence of “in question”:
– However, both of these only work if the werewolf in question is in wolf form.
– Can someone tell me whats the policy on nonsense at talk pages the article in question is Talk:Bearded dragon.
– The disease in question was mostly cholera.
– So sometimes one can also talk about the velocity of the thing in question and ignore its mass, and sometimes it is easier to understand things if we talk about the trajectory or path that something follows.
– If the page in question is spam, or similarly problematic, please use the corresponding talk page and mark with either, and your comment.
Example sentences of “in question”:
– The “book” in question presumably being the Christian Gospels.
– Simply load the URL in question and copy-paste a proper citation over it in a matter of a seconds.
– The vote was reverted and the IP in question was permenantly banned as a proxy.
– If the character in question is a main character and/or central to the plot and uniquely identifiable, the stuntman is then typically referred to as a “stunt double” in the credits.
– I’ve also seen many edits to discussions in recent days that I believe show the user in question unsuitable to be operating a flagged bot.
– I feel that the image in question would be perfectly acceptable in an article about Apple or its products or its marketing, but to use a registered trademark within userspace to express interest in the subject goes beyond the allowable purposes of using such images.
– In my opinion, the image in question simply shows things, as they are.
– How do you come up with the idea that the materials in question have come from “”the Manythings” website? Thank for very much for informing me there is a website which reuses materials of Voice of America.
– Change summary notes for copy-edits should be short, and mention that the change in question is a correction or improvement.
– I have not looked at all contributions of the editor in question before voting.
– The IP in question is part of the school IP range “Catholic Education Office of Western”.
– So rather than another round of quick deletions, I propose we discuss this: Suibject in question is in his late teens, and seems to have released a few singles.
– Higgs bosons contain the relative mass in the form of energy and once the field has endowed a formerly massless particle, the particle in question will slow down as it has now become “heavy”.
– While the account has been created in 2017, it has only in the next month when the article in question was created.
– Analysis suggested the genes in question had their origin at the base of the eukaryotic clades.
- The "book" in question presumably being the Christian Gospels.
- Simply load the URL in question and copy-paste a proper citation over it in a matter of a seconds.
- The vote was reverted and the IP in question was permenantly banned as a proxy.
More in-sentence examples of “in question”:
– Perhaps relevant is the fact that the person in question tried to hire me to create the page and when I said no, sent me angry emails and then found someone else to do it.
– This means that the image in question is not totally free for any use.
– The HGNC contacts authors who have published on the human gene in question by e-mail.
– Suppose we have enough of them, I am fine with creating subcategories to group them further; but the article in question misses the point altogether.
– It is not necessary to add this parameter if the sport in question has only one such notable organization.
– The politician in question was very close to the former president of the country.
– I’ve brought up the user in question as desysop because of his actions.
– The item in question is a fragment of the femur of a young cave bear, and has been dated to about 43,000 years ago.
– If the article in question is unable to reach the quorum, then this means it could not gather enough interest in the community.
– In other words: If the category in question contains other categories which are not related to sex/gender/sexual orientation, this is probably not the right point to split into gender-related categories.
– This is useful when a user may input either an abbreviation or a full name, but the template in question can only accept one of them.
– Suppose the taxon in question has the name “taxon-name” and the article it appears in has the title “article-title”.
– When there is an object or obstacle between the player in question and the target.
– The law in question must also be passed by the state assembly as well, except in the case of certain land law-related subjects.
– Talk pages are most certainly not supposed to be fully protected, even if the editor in question is not going to edit here anymore.
– I believe it is a very good indicator of whether the topic in question is notable.
– After looking further into this the Artist in question was listed among even more notable acts in 2019 on Jean-Michel Basquiat’s article in the legacy section before it was revised what made this particular act unique was that all the notable artist in the legacy section mentioned or paid tribute to the artist Basquiat but none were in a posthumous collaboration.
– Please try to improve the article or make a good-faith attempt to verify the citations in question before adding this template, and discuss the matter on the talk page.
– This raises the question, do we want categories for US settlements to include the name of the state or territory in their names? The reasoning for article names has been that it is not needed if there is no ambiguity, or if the place in question is the primary meaning of the name.
– I’d say that a pronunciation transcription is generally only necessary if the word in question is pronounced in an unexpected way.
– These templates are intended not only to communicate with the user in question but also to communicate with others.
– I am not an expert, and I don’t claim to be an expert, but simple math and first hand knowledge result in me concluding that the webpage in question is wildly inaccurate.
– I wholeheartedly accept the critique that the article in question is in need of change, but I do not believe it to be unworthy of inclusion.
– Person in question is a local celebrity with little to no notability outside of a limited area.
– The lady in question claimed to be able to tell whether the tea or the milk was added first to a cup.
– In fact, besides the article in question and copies of it on wiki mirror sites, I was only able to find results on this specific name on download sites.
– The ultimate number of names that is filled in the parameter is equal to, or greater than, the number of the seats in the district in question minus one, and greatly depends on the length of the subject’s term.
– The signs in question are called “speech acts”.
– I’m not opposed to the goals of this project: yesterday I was trying to find info for a homework for my second grade niece, and I have no clue about how to fix the article in question without clear criteria about what is “simple”.
– The person responsible gave the orders to pass by a signal, because he said the signal in question was broken.
– This infobox should be used if the state in question was “always” a subdivision of some larger entity.
– Going thorugh regular deletion, to give the authors time to show the person in question is notable, under our rules.
– The main article in question currently is Habesha Community.
– This means that the countries in question will get poorer.
– Should only be specified when development of a new version of the software product in question is in progress.
– Please try to improve the article or make a good faith attempt to verify the citations in question before adding this template, and discuss the matter on the talk page.
– In such cases, the Secretary or Clerk of the House in question was ruled competent to receive the bill.
– Where the person in question is still alive, the age is worked out up to.
– Person in question appears to have only many small roles in notable films, hence is questionably notable.
– The parameter inserts text in the message to specify the namespace the template in question should use.
– It should not be used where the editor in question is not making vandal edits.
– A full repeal occurs where the entire Act in question is repealed.
– While the rest of the Red Cross Movement many be multi-national, the Committee believes that its mono-national nature is an asset because the nationality in question is Swiss.
– The filter in question warns and tags signature additions, but does not consider the signatures within the deletion templates, which is a quite common thing across-the-board.
– Person in question has no en:wiki page.
– The address in question has regularly contributed.
– Furthermore it can be released with the permission of the user in question and also when ordered to by a court order or a subpoena.
- Perhaps relevant is the fact that the person in question tried to hire me to create the page and when I said no, sent me angry emails and then found someone else to do it.
- This means that the image in question is not totally free for any use.