How to use in-sentence of “deletion”:
– Unless we are seeking to rewrite the deletion policy, can we please adhere to procedure? Getting this RfD passed, by the way, will also make QD G4 legitimate in future.
– There is an active request for deletion for Shazir mucklai, but at least one person is repeatedly removing the RfD template/link from the article.
– It may express mutant proteins, such as deletion mutations or missense mutations.
– This sequence is still used humorously for epanorthosis by computer literates, denoting the deletion of a pretended blunder, much like a strikethrough.
– The outcome of this WP:RFDrequest for deletion was to redirect to microphone per WP:SNOW.
– I am asking about deletion here, because I think debate upon the usefulness of these pages should not be spread over 200-300 ‘Articles For Deletion‘ pages.
– I would like to add a clause that states that a user should know how to revert changes to a page, and also that candidates know how to use the Quick Deletion and RfD tags.
– An IP address has proposed the deletion of a section from the article Lysergic acid diethylamide.
Example sentences of “deletion”:
– I believe under the current quick deletion policy, admins are entitled to delete very short stubs, usually referred to as “one-liners”.
– I tend not to request for deletion of such articles, but this time, this is “very” far from our definition of core articles.
– I removed the deletion because there was a note saying I can remove it.
– Hello, I would like the deletion of the article Jonas Lohrmann to be checked here.
– So I have brought it here for deletion instead.
– Now that the simple english wiktionary is off its vote for deletion and has over 1,000 entries, I think we should begin to begin to weave the projects together.
– When a deletion needs to be made, the whole CD needs to be erased.
– Delete I’ve tagged for speedy deletion for A1, little or no meaning.
– There have been many discussions about deletion or moving complex chemistry articles fron namespace back into userspace.
– Anyway, you can check the deletion log of Camera and video camera…
- I believe under the current quick deletion policy, admins are entitled to delete very short stubs, usually referred to as "one-liners".
- I tend not to request for deletion of such articles, but this time, this is "very" far from our definition of core articles.
- I removed the deletion because there was a note saying I can remove it.
More in-sentence examples of “deletion”:
- The deletion of these articles is more a matter of notability than subject matter.
- This has been nominated already with the deletion tag, but has not been mentioned on here.
- I believe that this request for deletion is unjustified.
– The deletion of these articles is more a matter of notability than subject matter.
– This has been nominated already with the deletion tag, but has not been mentioned on here.
– I believe that this request for deletion is unjustified.
– Anyway, I guess deletion is in order.
– I am nominating this article for deletion because I don’t think the article meets WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG.
– Rather than create a Request for Deletion for each article affected, I wanted to see if we could agree here to follow the redirect recommendation.
– I thought that IPs could contribute to discussions by making comments, but they were not allowed to vote in requests for permissions, deletion and similar things.
– Everything else has been a revert or deletion nomination.
– EulerObama “has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:” Do not meet WP:Notability criteria.
– We’ve done a lot to reduce this number through mass deletion in recent times, but there are still an awful lot of them out there and this needs to change.
– I have experience with the admin duties, deletion of pages, blocking of users, protection etc and would like to carry out tasks here.
– I a recently created article for deletion at RFD because at first quick glance, it didn’t appear valid to me.
– The focus is to discuss the potential deletion or rewriting of an entire section, rather than the editing of a few phrases scattered in an article.
– I sincerely hope that these clarifications and amends will be sufficient to wave the deletion demand as I do not see anything in contradiction with the wiki guidelines.
– If prompting user for deletion reason, just display a link.
– In such a case, the page should be undeleted and listed on for a period of five days following the deletion of the user page.
– Hence I am puzzled at the existence of this deletion discussion.
– Don’t use this template on any page which doesn’t have a quick deletion tag.
– I didn’t request of quick deletion of the other three, and decided to request others to comment about them.
– If an article is being moved to userspace to avoid deletion and then moved using the move button.
– Given that the person we are talking aobut is just 9 years old, I’d opt for deletion though.
– This is the first time I have participated in a deletion discussion on Simple, so I hope I am doing it correctly.
– There are alternatives to deletion also.
– At least one of the other deletion criteria must still apply to the page, and you must make mention of this in your rationale.
– As they do not fall under A4, an RfD is needed to see if there is consensus to refer back to for deletion of non-notable storms and give the admins a bit of leeway in the matter.
– RfD is the appropriate method for deletion at that point.
– For some reason I can’t rollback the deletion of Universe.
– The user continually recreates articles with non-notable subjects and articles going through deletion processes, user continually recreates articles and assumes they’re in good standing with the community through various article creation requests.
– I can’t support deletion with banned contributor.
– One last thing: you were advised to “invite” the editors who previously commented on the various deletion discussions for this article.
– I will do the article deletion tomorrow, unless someone else does.
– I feel that the whole deletion process will be much cleaner and neater if sysops on this wiki are able to set the flood flag on themselves.
– Sju hav suggested I try opening deletion discussions on them, but I want to see the community’s view on these articles.
– In a “indirect” way, I have found that there “is now” an ongoing deletion discussion.
– I felt so strongly about this, I had to use a test account to sockpuppeteer in a deletion vote.
– I’ve had quite a bit of experience with speedy deletion tagging, RC patrol, and also deletion discussion.
– I believe that I have been correctly tagging articles for deletion that need it; I also believe that I have learned about blocking.
– Support deletion – Agree with nominator’s comment, way too specific.
– I’d support a discussion regarding updating of the revision deletion policy, but I am definitely opposed to continuing this as a heated debate.
– If the deletion goes through, I will eliminate the shortcut for BE 1500 in the target article.
– How would other admins have treated the QD request? Obviously that sentence in the deletion policy which simply says should be clarified after this discussion.
– The outcome of this Deletion Review is the previous RfD is.
– I know he used to add a reference, but in a number of recent A4 deletion cases, we’ve lost international footballers who have represented Juventus.
– In some cases, this problem can be fixed by removing the hatnote from the article, but in other cases, the issue with the underlying redirect, including possible edit wars or deletion discussions, will need to be resolved.
– Therefore, this request for deletion is for the deletion of every page created about footballers and seasons of football by Nameless User.
– He has nominated more articles for quick deletion than I care to mention and made over 60 VIP reports, treating vandals fairly, with good faith until no other course of action bar VIP remains.
– But that he might want to think about what he was doing, because almost all of them qualify for speedy deletion under the unlikely typo speedy criteria.