How to use in-sentence of “bots”:
– I’ve noticed in the last couple of days that some bots and some people using AWB are organizing interwiki by alphabetizing the two-letter abbreviation.
– The templates can be used to block most bots or specific bots by name or function.
– Non-administrators can report misbehaving bots to.
– Sysops are allowed to and should block uninvited bots on sight.
– Most tools and bots only want to know about disambig templates.
– These bots do not usually edit often enough for them to need the bot flag.
Example sentences of “bots”:
- Spam bots should be treated the same as vandalbots.
- We need some policy on Bots urgently.
- Let the global bots do it.
– Spam bots should be treated the same as vandalbots.
– We need some policy on Bots urgently.
– Let the global bots do it.
– Just a thought, perhaps this list could be trimmed/updated, and inactive bots be removed/have their flags removed? Certainly quite a few tasks are obsolete on some bots.
– There is also the possibility of running other bots important to the wiki from the same project.
– I know there are bots cleaning it up hourly thus no one can do long-term damage to that page, but I still believe a better idea is to send them to the actual sandbox if they want to actually try editing: this way they will be taught that if they want to mess around, use the sandbox, not just any page on the website.
– Hi all, I noticed some bots which are used in the past for interwiki links are inactive for quite a long period of time.
– So the interwiki bots need to know about the set index templates.
– I’m very interested in working RFP and the BOTS page when I’m able.
– Per proposal, please have some bots move the tags on talk pages.
– I am concerned for bots like is inactive and have been indef for sockpuppetery at zhwp.
– Shouldn’t be a problem…but if you are using it in this way do you really need to use a bot? Can’t you just add the link to en.wiki and allow the other bots to do the rest? Interwiki bots are really for ongoing tasks and don’t really stop.
– Burroughs interwiki to the article on fywiki, and then bots added it everywhere else.
– IRC Bots/Chatroom bots are used in many things now, from sending RuneScape statistics, to keeping track of users who abuse the networks.
– Many of our abuse filters were made or contributed to by Operator, he’s written code for bots we use on IRC channels, and is very well-versed in networking, IP addresses, and the like.
More in-sentence examples of “bots”:
- Users should be aware that by opting-out of bot posts, they will not be notified of matters relating to material they have edited or uploaded, which are tagged or scanned by bots per policy.
- From my personal experience with admin/antivandal bots safely detecting general vandalism is much much harder than just serial vandalism.
– Users should be aware that by opting-out of bot posts, they will not be notified of matters relating to material they have edited or uploaded, which are tagged or scanned by bots per policy.
– From my personal experience with admin/antivandal bots safely detecting general vandalism is much much harder than just serial vandalism.
– Why do we need to have bots creating our articles for us? Whatever happened to quality, not quantity? I’d much prefer to see us have a small amount of articles of good quality than thousands of short one sentence stubs, as many of these rivers and communes seem to be.
– The IW bots will do the rest and spread the information back here to our pages.
– I feel this is far less complex than mixing bots in the selection.
– It is highly debatable to allow bots to run rampant, and make opinionated conclusions about lowercase words.
– Hopefully, manually entered IW links will get picked up by bots for entry into the system ie.
– Several semi-automated tools and bots facilitate orphan-tagging.
– Concerning the two recent blockings of my bot it’s not really a personal error, but linked to these collective decisions: straw poll on all the fr.wikt bots and on the fr.w evaluations system.
– If you do place the it will be detected as an error by syntax-checking bots and will then be placed in the syntax cleanup project queue and will need to be fixed by someone.
– I just realized that two bots clean the sandbox.
– Using these parameters can assist bots or other automated processing to detect which date format is intended; leaving the format as default may lead an editor or bot to change the format to an unintended value.
– This template can be used to encapsulate deliberate or apparent typos to save them from correction by bots and automated wiki-editors.
– Global bots are limited in what they can do; they can only deal with interwiki links and double redirect.
– During their approval process, bots may make up to 50 edits to show how they will be working.
– You are of course free to continue making those changes, but, if you wanted, you could hold off and let the bots make those changes.
– What I noticed is that with new articles, bots come along rather rapidly to add missing interwiki links.
– In the European Union, for example, bots must now ask for permission to mine data from users.
– Your articles and bots help to keep the entire project together in many ways and you can not be thanked enough for them.
– This statement may deny neither Bot1 nor Bot2, only one of the two bots, or both bots as intended.
– These values can assist bots or other automated processing to detect the intended date format; omitting the df parameter may lead an editor or bot to change the format to an unintended value.
– Accounts used by approved bots to make pre-approved changes can be flagged as such.
– Popular IRC bots include Infobot, blootbot, Supybot.
– The bots that currently support exclusion are listed at exclusion compliant bots.
– Each project that want to allow the global bots must opt-in to the process before the bots are allowed on that project.
– The server currently has three bots that help in various ways.
– Hi all, now that wikidata has been deployed to all wikis, I propose the mass deflagging of all bots whose “sole purpose” is to maintain interwiki links.
– I would like to seek the same assistance from the admins here to finally stop his destructive edits, since bots are keep on posting wikilinks in en.wiki pointing here with an article that was created by that vandal.
– Once a few more people show up and discuss this, we can come to a decision as to whether “unflagged” bots can edit, or if we will allow them to edit without a flag.
– What I can imagine is that bots operate on “new” articles, and that imported articles do not get tagged as new.
– For example, this can be used to opt-in or opt-out from user talk bot messages or to cause maintenance bots to avoid certain pages.
– He has many successors since Jack bots are usually destroyed.
– So other bots don’t have to load the same pages again.
– That is mainly given Wikidata were estabilished in 2013, and it is no longer necessary to have dozens of bots that maintain interwiki links.
– Some users operate Bots that will go through and make repetitive changes like what you are doing with the “Other Websites” sections.
– Do we allow the bots to continue running.
– There would likely be a drop in bot requests as well as more bots checking us regularly as they no longer would need to go through the application process to work here.
– For the single-player campaign, the player can command two command bots to help the player.
– Please leave my bots unblocked, as well as account creation by my IP and email by my username.
– Some other bots make occasional edits here, usually creating interwiki links, but do not have a bot flag.
– In view of this, what will we need to do about the bots we have that maintain interwikis links? Discontinue them? Convert them to remove links from pages where possible? Discuss.
– The stewards will assign the permission only to time-proven bots that are already approved at a number of projects, like ListeriaBot.
– Due to the issues mentioned above, I’d rather do the linking manually than have bots do the work for us.
– I think we need a policy page about the use of global rights like global bots and global rollback.
– Note: AWB and interwiki bots will generally fix this.
– The keyword is intended for use by bots to identify original URLs that are live but not confirmed to link to appropriate material.