Question: Do you think scientific advancements should be regulated or restricted?

Sample Answer (The AREA technique):

Answer: I think scientific advancements should be regulated and monitored to ensure that they are safe, ethical, and beneficial for society.

Reason: While scientific advancements can offer many benefits and opportunities for innovation and progress, they can also pose risks and challenges that need to be addressed through appropriate oversight and regulation.

Example: For instance, genetic engineering and biotechnology have the potential to transform medicine, agriculture, and industry, but also raise concerns about the safety, environmental impact, and ethical implications of manipulating living organisms and genetic information.

Alternative: While regulation and restriction can be important, it is also important to ensure that they do not hinder or stifle scientific progress or innovation, and to balance the need for safety and responsibility with the need for exploration and discovery.